ANTHROPOLOGICAL INTENTION OF PHILOSOPHIZING OF RENE DESCARTES AND ITS MANIFESTATION IN THE TEXT «THE RULES»

Anatolii Malivskyi

Abstract


Purpose. Based on the understanding of The New Time philosophy as a response to the challenges of the era in relation to the construction of an objective picture of the world and the self-creation of man, to analyze the main options for evaluating the ambivalence of the basic intention of the philosophy of Descartes in the research literature and to clarify the nature of ambiguity. To justify the dominant nature of anthropological intention in the text of the «Rules for Guiding the Mind in Searching for the Truth». Novelty. The nature of the ambivalence of the basic intention of the text of the "Rules" is clarified as a form of two basic existences, opposite to the New Time, namely the query on the objectivity of scientific knowledge and inquiry in anthropology as a cornerstone of philosophy. The author of the article proves the domination of anthropological component of the text «The Rules» in front of scientific knowledge. Conclusions. The main manifestations of ambivalence of basic directivity of philosophizing of Rene Descartes to construction of an objective picture of the world and self-creation of person were described. The determining influence on the process of the establishment of basic intention of the specificity of the experience of mathematical knowledge and Plato’s and Aristotle’s tradition of philosophizing for the first, and of personal tradition of Christianity in the second place was emphasized. In the reference to the text «The Rules» of Descartes the ambiguity of the basic direction was argued, the nature and domination of the anthropological intention were justified.


Keywords


anthropology; reductionism; ambivalence; objectivity; self-creation of person

References


Avhustyn Sviatyi, Mushaka Yu. Spovid [Confession]. Kyiv, Osnovy Publ., 1999. 319 p.

Dmitriev T.A. Problema metodicheskogo somneniya v filosofii Rene Dekarta [The problem of methodical doubt in the philosophy of Rene Descartes]. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2007. 231 p.

Kassirer E. Opyt o cheloveke: vvedeniye v filosofiyu chelovecheskoy kultury [The experience on man: an introduction to philosophy of human culture]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [The problem of man in Western philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, pp. 3-30.

Malivskiy A.N. Antropologizatsiya bazovogo proekta Dekarta v sovremennoy istoriko-filosofskoy literature [Anthropologization of base project of Descartes in contemporary historical and philosophical literature]. Sententiae, 2013, vol. 28, no. 1, pp.51-62.

Marion Zh.-L. Yaku metafizyku mistyt metod? [What metaphysics contains a method?]. «Medytatsii» Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachen: Zhan-Mari Beisad, Zhan-Liuk Marion, Kim San On-Van-Kun ["Meditations" of Descartes in the mirror of modern interpretations: Jean-Marie Based, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim San On Van Kun]. Kyiv, Duh i litera Publ., 2014, pp. 67-92.

Mariten Zh. Kratkiy ocherk o sushchestvovanii i sushchestvuyushchem [A short essay about existence and existing]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [The problem of man in Western philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, pp. 229-260.

Riker P. Sam yak inshyi [Himself as a different]. Kyiv, Duh I litera Publ., 2002. 458 p.

Khaydegger M. Yevropeyskiy nigilizm. T. ІІ [European nihilism. Vol. II]. Saint-Petersburg, Vladimir Dal Publ., 2007. 130 p.

Khoma O. Ingenium i «deduktyvnyi metod» Dekarta [Ingenium and "deductive method" of Descartes]. Sentencia, 2010, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 192-207.

Khoma O. Istoryko-filosofski stereotypy ta suchasne prochytannia Dekartovykh «Medytatsii» [Historical and philosophical stereotypes and modern interpretation of the Cartesian "Meditation"]. «Medytatsii» Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachen: Zhan-Mari Beisad, Zhan-Liuk Marion, Kim San On-Van-Kun ["Meditations" of Descartes in the mirror of modern interpretations: Jean-Marie Based, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim San On Van Kun]. Kyiv, Duh I Litera Publ., 2014, pp. 333-360.

Arendt H. The human condition. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 1958. 349 p.

Clarke D.M. Descartes: A Biography. Chicago, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2006. 520 p. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511498077.

Cottingham J. Cartesian Reflections. Essays on Descartes’s Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford UP Publ., 2008. 332 р.

Cottingham J. A Descartes Dictionary. Oxford, Blackwell Publ., 1993. 200 p.

Descartes R. Oeuvres completes in 11 vol. Paris, Vrin, publiées par Ch. Adam et P. Tannery Publ., 1996.

Franco A.B. Descartes Theory of Passions. Pitsburg, University of Pittsburg Publ., 2006. 322 p.

Gaukroger S. Descartes: Аn Іintellectual Вiography. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 1995. 449 p. doi: 10.1093/0198237243.001.0001.

Kraye J. Conception of moral philosophy. Volume ІІ. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth. Cambridge, Century Philosophy Publ., 1998, pp. 1279-1316.

Latour B. Poter C. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, Catherine Porter. Harvard, Harvard University Press Publ., 2013. 486 p. . doi: 10.1086/679177.

Van Leeuwen E. Method, Discourse and the Act of Knowing. Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes. Oxford, Oxford Scholarship Publ., 1993, pp. 224-241. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195075519.003.0015.

Marion J.-L. Cartesian Question: method and metaphysics. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 1999. 215 р. doi: 10.1016/s0898-1221(99)90147-5.


GOST Style Citations


1. Августин Святий. Сповідь. / Августин Святий [Пер. з лат. Ю. Мушака]. – Київ : Основи, 1999. – 319 с.

2. Дмитриев, Т. А. Проблема методического сомнения в философии Рене Декарта / Т. А. Дмитриев. – Москва : ИФ РАН, 2007. – 231 с.

3. Кассирер, Э. Опыт о человеке: введение в философию человеческой культуры / Є. Кассиер // Проблема человека в западной философии. – Москва : Прогресс, 1988. – C. 3–30.

4. Маливский, А. Н. Антропологизация базового проекта Декарта в современной историко-философской литературе / А. Н, Маливский // Sententiae. – 2013. – Т. 28. – № 1. – С. 51–62.

5. Марйон, Ж.-Л. Яку метафізику містить метод? / Ж.-Л. Марйон // «Медитації» Декарта у дзеркалі сучасних тлумачень: Жан-Марі Бейсад, Жан-Люк Марйон, Кім Сан Он-Ван-Кун [Пер. з фр. і лат.]. – Київ : Дух і Літера, 2014. – C. 67–92.

6. Маритен, Ж. Краткий очерк о существовании и существующем / Ж. Маритен // Проблема человека в западной философии. – Москва : Прогресс, 1988. – С. 229–260.

7. Рікер, П. Сам як інший. / П. Рікер [Пер. з фр.]. – 2-е вид-во. – Київ : Дух і літера, 2002. – 458 с.

8. Хайдеггер, М. Европейский нигилизм. Т. ІІ / М. Хайдеггер. – Санкт-Петербург : Владимир Даль, 2007. – 130 с.

9. Хома, О. Ingenium і «дедуктивний метод» Декарта / О. Хома // Sentencia – 2010. – Т. 22. – № 1. – С. 192–207.

10. Хома, О. Історико-філософські стереотипи та сучасне прочитання Декартових «Медитацій» / Хома О. // «Медитації» Декарта у дзеркалі сучасних тлумачень: Жан-Марі Бейсад, Жан-Люк Марйон, Кім Сан Он-Ван-Кун [Пер. з фр. і лат. ] – Київ : Дух і Літера, 2014. – С. 333–360.

11. Arendt, H. The human condition / H. Arendt. – Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1958. – 349 p.

12. Clarke, D. M. Descartes: A Biography / D. M. Clarke – Chicago : Cambridge University Press, 2006. – 520 p. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511498077.

13. Cottingham, J. Cartesian Reflections. Essays on Descartes’s Philosophy / J. Cottinham. – Oxford : Oxford UP, 2008. – 332 р.

14. Cottingham, J. A Descartes Dictionary / J. Cottinham. – Oxford : Blackwell, 1993. – 200 p.

15. Descartes, R. Oeuvres completes in 11 vol. / R. Descartes – Paris: Vrin, publiées par Ch. Adam et P. Tannery, 1996.

16. Franco, A. B. Descartes Theory of Passions / A. B. Franco. – Pitsburg : University of Pittsburg. 2006. – 322 p.

17. Gaukroger, S. Descartes: Аn Intellectual Вiography / S. Gukroger. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995. – 449 p. doi: 10.1093/0198237243.001.0001.

18. Kraye, J. Conception of moral philosophy. Volume ІІ / J. Kraye // The Cambridge History of Seventeenth. – Cambridge : Century Philosophy, 1998. – P.1279-1316.

19. Latour, B. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, Catherine Porter / B. Latour, C. Porter. – Harvard : Harvard University Press, 2013. – 486 p. doi: 10.1086/679177.

20. Van Leeuwen, E. Method, Discourse and the Act of Knowing / E. van Leeuwen // Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes. – Oxford : Oxford Scholarship, 1993. – Р. 224–241. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195075519.003.0015.

21. Marion, J.-L. Cartesian Question: method and metaphysics / J.-L. Marion. – Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1999. – 215 р. doi: 10.1016/s0898-1221(99)90147-5.

 





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/55737

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.