ANTHROPOLOGICAL INTENTION OF PHILOSOPHIZING OF RENE DESCARTES AND ITS MANIFESTATION IN THE TEXT «THE RULES»
Keywords:anthropology, reductionism, ambivalence, objectivity, self-creation of person
Purpose. Based on the understanding of The New Time philosophy as a response to the challenges of the era in relation to the construction of an objective picture of the world and the self-creation of man, to analyze the main options for evaluating the ambivalence of the basic intention of the philosophy of Descartes in the research literature and to clarify the nature of ambiguity. To justify the dominant nature of anthropological intention in the text of the «Rules for Guiding the Mind in Searching for the Truth». Novelty. The nature of the ambivalence of the basic intention of the text of the "Rules" is clarified as a form of two basic existences, opposite to the New Time, namely the query on the objectivity of scientific knowledge and inquiry in anthropology as a cornerstone of philosophy. The author of the article proves the domination of anthropological component of the text «The Rules» in front of scientific knowledge. Conclusions. The main manifestations of ambivalence of basic directivity of philosophizing of Rene Descartes to construction of an objective picture of the world and self-creation of person were described. The determining influence on the process of the establishment of basic intention of the specificity of the experience of mathematical knowledge and Plato’s and Aristotle’s tradition of philosophizing for the first, and of personal tradition of Christianity in the second place was emphasized. In the reference to the text «The Rules» of Descartes the ambiguity of the basic direction was argued, the nature and domination of the anthropological intention were justified.
Avhustyn Sviatyi, Mushaka Yu. Spovid [Confession]. Kyiv, Osnovy Publ., 1999. 319 p.
Dmitriev T.A. Problema metodicheskogo somneniya v filosofii Rene Dekarta [The problem of methodical doubt in the philosophy of Rene Descartes]. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2007. 231 p.
Kassirer E. Opyt o cheloveke: vvedeniye v filosofiyu chelovecheskoy kultury [The experience on man: an introduction to philosophy of human culture]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [The problem of man in Western philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, pp. 3-30.
Malivskiy A.N. Antropologizatsiya bazovogo proekta Dekarta v sovremennoy istoriko-filosofskoy literature [Anthropologization of base project of Descartes in contemporary historical and philosophical literature]. Sententiae, 2013, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51-62.
Marion Zh.-L. Yaku metafizyku mistyt metod? [What metaphysics contains a method?]. «Medytatsii» Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachen: Zhan-Mari Beisad, Zhan-Liuk Marion, Kim San On-Van-Kun ["Meditations" of Descartes in the mirror of modern interpretations: Jean-Marie Based, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim San On Van Kun]. Kyiv, Duh i litera Publ., 2014, pp. 67-92.
Mariten Zh. Kratkiy ocherk o sushchestvovanii i sushchestvuyushchem [A short essay about existence and existing]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [The problem of man in Western philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, pp. 229-260.
Riker P. Sam yak inshyi [Himself as a different]. Kyiv, Duh I litera Publ., 2002. 458 p.
Khaydegger M. Yevropeyskiy nigilizm. T. ІІ [European nihilism. Vol. II]. Saint-Petersburg, Vladimir Dal Publ., 2007. 130 p.
Khoma O. Ingenium i «deduktyvnyi metod» Dekarta [Ingenium and "deductive method" of Descartes]. Sentencia, 2010, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 192-207.
Khoma O. Istoryko-filosofski stereotypy ta suchasne prochytannia Dekartovykh «Medytatsii» [Historical and philosophical stereotypes and modern interpretation of the Cartesian "Meditation"]. «Medytatsii» Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachen: Zhan-Mari Beisad, Zhan-Liuk Marion, Kim San On-Van-Kun ["Meditations" of Descartes in the mirror of modern interpretations: Jean-Marie Based, Jean-Luc Marion, Kim San On Van Kun]. Kyiv, Duh I Litera Publ., 2014, pp. 333-360.
Arendt H. The human condition. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 1958. 349 p.
Clarke D.M. Descartes: A Biography. Chicago, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2006. 520 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511498077.
Cottingham J. Cartesian Reflections. Essays on Descartes’s Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford UP Publ., 2008. 332 р.
Cottingham J. A Descartes Dictionary. Oxford, Blackwell Publ., 1993. 200 p.
Descartes R. Oeuvres completes in 11 vol. Paris, Vrin, publiées par Ch. Adam et P. Tannery Publ., 1996.
Franco A.B. Descartes Theory of Passions. Pitsburg, University of Pittsburg Publ., 2006. 322 p.
Gaukroger S. Descartes: Аn Іintellectual Вiography. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 1995. 449 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237243.001.0001.
Kraye J. Conception of moral philosophy. Volume ІІ. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth. Cambridge, Century Philosophy Publ., 1998, pp. 1279-1316.
Latour B., Poter C. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, Catherine Porter. Harvard, Harvard University Press Publ., 2013. 486 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/679177.
Van Leeuwen E. Method, Discourse and the Act of Knowing. Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes. Oxford, Oxford Scholarship Publ., 1993, pp. 224-241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195075519.003.0015.
Marion J.-L. Cartesian Question: method and metaphysics. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 1999. 215 р. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0898-1221(99)90147-5.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2015 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).