PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIALLY CREATED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/55733

Keywords:

artificial intelligence system designed, inter-machine environment, artificial intelligence, neural networks, machine learning

Abstract

Purpose. Understanding the philosophical and anthropological importance of the development the artificial intelligence systems requires the analysis of the socio and anthropological content of intercomputer problems of interaction in the context of media philosophical praxis, anthropological maintenance of intellect nature, considering the specifics of the concept of artificial intelligence systems in the environment of M2M development of socio-cognitive practices of intercomputer interaction of social and humanitarian potential. Methodology. The implementation target is seen in the use of scientific and theoretical basis of the media philosophical, philosophical anthropology, the media philosophical approach to understanding society, science and technology, the use of publications on selected topics of research. Scientific novelty. The concept of artificial intelligence systems in the aspect of social and humanitarian potential of their formation and development in the environment of M2M was considered. The problems of machine learning as technology transformation M2M were analysed. The anthropological threats to the development of artificially created intelligent systems were defined. Conclusions. From the global risks point of view, one of the most critical circumstances due to the artificial intelligent system can strengthen its intelligence very quickly. The obvious reason for suspecting such an opportunity – a recursive self-improvement. Such system becomes smarter, including the intelligent writing of internal cognitive function, that the ability to rewrite their existing cognitive function to make it work better. This will make such systems more intelligent, and smarter in terms of the processing itself. The success of artificial intelligence may be the beginning of the end of the human race. Almost any technology falling into malicious hands reveals the potential for harm, but when it comes to artificial intelligent system, there is a new problem with the fact that these malicious hands may belong to the technology itself.

Author Biography

Yu. D. Gensitskiy, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Yu. D. Gensitskiy

References

Lukianets V.S., Kravchenko O.M., Moroz O.Ya. Industriia naukovykh znan: vplyv na sotsiohumanitarnu sferu [The industry of scientific knowledge: the impact on the world socogetra]. Kyiv, UkrSICh Publ., 2015. 407 p.

Kuzin L.T. Osnovy kibernetiki: V 2-kh t. T. 2. Osnovy kiberneticheskikh modeley [Fundamentals of Cybernetics: In 2 vo. Vol.2 . Fundamentals of cybernetic models]. Moscow,:Energiya Publ., 1979. 584 p.

Rotenberh V.S. Vnutrishnia mova i dynamizm poetychnoho myslennia [Inner speech and the dynamism of poetic thinking]. Filosofski nauky – Philosophy sciences, 1991, no. 6, pp. 157-164.

Tyuring A. Mogut li mashiny myslit? [Can the machines think?], 2004. 67 p.

Utekhin I. Vzaimodeystviye s «umnymi veshchami»: vvedeniye v problematiku [Interaction with "smart things": introduction to issues]. Antropologicheskiy forum 17 [Anthropological forum 17], 2012, pp. 134-156.

Filosofiya iskusstvennogo intellekta [The philosophy of artificial intelligence]. Materialy Vserossiyskoy mezhdistsiplinarnoy konferentsii [Materials of all-Russian Interdisciplinary Conf.]. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2005. 400 p.

Shvyrkov O.I. Problema shtuchnoho intelektu i liudynovymirnist shtuchnykh intelektualnykh system Dok. Diss. [The problem of artificial intelligence and luginbill artificial intelligent systems. Doc. Diss.]. Zhytomyr, 2006. 170 p.

Yudkovski Ye. Iskusstvennyy intellekt kak pozitivnyy i negativnyy faktor globalnogo riska [Artificial intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk]. Available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/6250354. (Accessed 26.Nov.2015).

Floridi L. Artificial Agents and Their Moral Nature. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, 2014, vol. 17, pp. 185-212. doi: 10.5860/choice.37-0072.

Hayles K.A. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press Publ., 1999. 364 p. doi: 10.5860/choice.37-0072.

Kurzweil R. The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York, Penguin Publ., 2006. 672 p. doi: 10.2307/20031996.

Kurzweil R. How to Make a Mind. Futurist, 2013, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 14-17.

Turing A., Copeland B.J. The essential Turing: seminal writings in computing, logic, philosophy, artificial intelligence, and artificial life, plus the secrets of Enigma. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 2004. 600 p.

Hawking S., Russell S., Tegmark M., Wilczek F. Stephen Hawking : Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence-but are we taking seriously enough? The Independent, 2014. Available at : http://goo.gl/Me91ha. (Accessed 26.Nov.2015).

Weizenbaum J. Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. Oxford, W. H. Freeman & Co Publ., 1976. 300 p. doi: 10.2307/3103715.

Published

2015-12-09

How to Cite

Gensitskiy, Y. D. (2015). PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIALLY CREATED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (8), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/55733

Issue

Section

THE MAN IN TECHNOSPHERE