Serhei A. Ostrenko


The Purpose is to recover rhizome and barocco as cultural-ontological foundations of innovative process. Methodology is subjective analysis of conceptions ‘rhizome’ and ‘barocco’, thematization their presence in space of innovation carry out with using discoursing approaches’ of phenomenology, comparative, structuralism. Scientific Novelty. Rhizome has been opened as cultural-ontological foundation in its processes, problems, pre-predicative functions, totality, transcendence and principles of connection, diversity, cartography, re-traicng etc. It is showed that barocco with rhizome founds innovative process in some aspects: fold, binary, extension and texture. Conclusions. Rhizome as one of the foundations of innovation shows its non-line, statistic character that determines its creative potential and opens in two directions: from innovation to rhizome and on the contrary. In the first case when we have a deal with innovative characteristics as process, problems, pre-predicative, totality, transcendence. In the second case we have a deal with the principles which can carry out innovative activity: a) connection (unavoidable of freedom of researcher, and it correlates with the principle of epistemological anarchism ‘Anything goes’); b) inhomogeneity (maintenance of multiplicity of innovative decisions that correlates with postpositivistic principle of proliferation); c) multiplicity (attitude on principle refuse from tradition in innovative activity); d) a-signed break (non-line character of innovative processes); e) cartography (constructive character of innovations with possibility of variety of different senses); f) re-tracing (critical attitude to the past and probable results in the future). Barocco consist in specific of innovative activity on contemporary period and has some parameters: fold: innovative activity in conceptual and methodological aspects are carrying out as multiple folds, crossing of different sense fields: b) binary opposition ‘interior – exterior’: innovative activity is a point of crossing and break of spontaneous and determine processes; c) binary opposition ‘up – down’: innovative activity has non-line, topological character; d) extension: in innovative activity priority has process on ending; e) texture as sing of singular character of innovative process; f) paradigm underlines fundamental, whole, universal character of innovation.


innovation; rhizome; barocco; binary; fold; extension; texture; de-tracing; diversity; postmodernism; paradigm


Deleuze J. Kapitalizm i shizofrenia. Tysyacha plato [Capitalism and Schizophrenia. A Thousand Plateaus]. Ekaterinburg, U-Factoria, 2010. 895 p.

Deleuze J. Logika smysla [Logic of sense]. Moscow, Raritet, 1998. P.10–440.

Deleuze J. Skladka. Leibnitz i barokko [The Fold. Leibniz and the Baroque]. Moscow, Logos, 1997. 264 p.

Korol’ A.D. ‘Arifmetika’ obrazovania: mezhpredmetnaya i metapredmetnaya funkcii dialoga [‘Arithmetic’ of education: Intersubjective and Metasubjective Functions of Dialouge]. Internet Zhurnal ‘Eidos’ – Internet-Magazine Eidos, 2012, no5. Available at : http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2012/0829-06.htm

Smirnov I.P. Prevrashchenia smysla [Transforming of Sence]. Moscow, Novoe Lit. Obozrenie, 2015. – 314 p.

Feyerabend P. Izbrannye Trudy po metodologii nauki [Selected Works from Methodology of Science]. Moscow, Progress, 1986. – 542 p.

Feyerabend P. Protiv metodologicheskogo prinuzhdenia. Ocherk anarchistskoj teorii poznaniya [Anti Methodological Enforcement. Essay of Anarchic Theory of Cognition]. Moscow, ACT, 2007. – 413 с.

Khutorskoj A.V. Chto takoe sovremennyj urok [What is Contemporary Lesson]. Internet Zhurnal ‘Eidos’ – Internet-Magazine Eidos, 2012, no5. Available at : http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2012/0529-10.htm

Chen M. Education Nation: Six Leading Edges of Innovation in our Schools / M. Chen. – San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 2010. – 276 p.

Wagner T. Creating Innovators. The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World / T. Wagner. – New York : Shribner, 2012. – 285 p.

GOST Style Citations

1. Делёз Ж. Капитализм и шизофрения. Тысяча плато / Ж. Делёз, Ф. Гваттари, пер. с франц. Я.И. Свирского. – Екатеринбург : У-Фактория, 2010. – 895 с.

2. Делёз Ж. Логика смысла / Ж. Делёз. – М .:Раритет, 1998. – С.10–440.

3. Делёз Ж. Складка. Лейбниц и барокко / Ж.Делёз. – М. : Логос, 1997. – 264 с.

4. Король А.Д. «Арифметика» образования: межпредметная и метапредметная функции диалога [Электронный ресурс] / А.Д. Король // Интернет-журнал «Эйдос». – 2012. – №5. – Режим доступа :

5. Смирнов И.П. Превращения смысла / И.П. Смирнов. – М. : Новое лит. Обозрение, 2015. – 314 с.

6. Фейерабенд П. Избранные труды по методологии науки / П. Фейерабенд. – М. : Прогресс, 1986. – 542 с.

7. Фейерабенд П. Против методологического принуждения. Очерк анархистской теории познания / Ж. Делёз, пер. с фран. А. Никифорова. – М. : АСТ, 2007. – 413 с.

8. Хуторской А.В. Что такое современный урок [Электронный ресурс] / А.В. Хуторской // Интернет-журнал «Эйдос». – 2012. – №2. – Режим доступа : http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2012/0529-10.htm

9. Chen M. Education Nation: Six Leading Edges of Innovation in our Schools / M. Chen. – San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 2010. – 276 p.

10. Wagner T. Creating Innovators. The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World / T. Wagner. – New York : Shribner, 2012. – 285 p.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/43439

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.