How Does Homo Digitalis Empathize?




artificial intelligence, Homo digitalis, strategic rationality, moral, social networks, human, individual, personification


Purpose. The article aimed at identifying the effects of modern digital technologies on the formation of human morality. Theoretical basis. The research base is the practical communicative philosophy. Originality. It lies in the fact that the article considered a moral interaction between a person and artificial intelligence. Conclusions. Nowadays modern digital technologies have acquired a new importance. Previously, they were only passive assistants. But now they are able to actively influence human nature not only from the outside, yet also from the inside. Now they influence not only the form of thoughts but also their character. It is artificial intelligence that is the cause of the phenomenon of the "information bubble" ("echo chamber"). They are formed by mathematical algorithms for each individual user of the Internet. It is because of these algorithms, which are the basis of artificial intelligence, that we can conclude: they are guided only by strategic rationality. Therefore, they relate to the Internet user only as an object. That is why such a situation can also be a manifestation of the expansion of strategic rationality into the lifeworld, which gives rise to social pathologies. New digital technologies (first of all, social networks) are becoming an integral part of a person’s everyday life, and therefore the background of his/her life world. Virtual life becomes an important part of real life. However, virtual life is formed by the influence of the information stream, which constantly sets new "trends", including "trends" on morality. That is why a person begins to perceive only those events that are contained in this stream. Moreover, s\he can express his\her empathy only when s/he him/herself is able to join this stream and express it in virtual life.


Habermas, J. (1991). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (C. Lenhardt & S. Weber Nicholsen, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press. (in English)

Kiros, H. (2022, September 20). Hated that video? YouTube’s algorithm might push you another just like it. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from (in English)

Kobelieva, D. L., & Nikolaienko, N. M. (2021). From Information Search to the Loss of Personality: The Phenomenon of Dataism. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (20), 100-112. DOI: (in English)

Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues (pp. 31-53). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (in English)

Kremen, V. H., & Ilin, V. V. (2021). Transformation of the Human Image in the Paradigm of Knowledge Evolution. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (19), 5-14. DOI: (in English)

Kultaieva, M. (2020). Homo Digitalis, Digital culture and Digital Education: Explorations of Philosophical Anthropology and of Philosophy of Education. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 26(1), 8-36. DOI: (in Ukrainian)

Liutyi, T. (2020). Kultura prynad i sprotyvu. Kyiv: Tempora. (in Ukrainian)

Mykulanynets, L. M. (2019). Image of Human in the Postmodern Epoch. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (16), 43-54. DOI: (in English)

Schulz, A. W. (2017). The evolution of empathy. In H. Maibom (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (pp. 64-73). London: Routledge. DOI: (in English)

Shapoval, V. M., & Tolstov, I. V. (2021). Quo Vadis: Anthropological Dimension of the Modern Civilization Crisis. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (19), 23-31. DOI: (in English)

Turiel, E. (1974). Conflict and Transition in Adolescent Moral Development. Child Development, 45(1), 14-29. DOI: (in Enslish)

Yermolenko, A. M. (1999). Komunikatyvna praktychna filosofiia. Kyiv: Libra. (in Ukrainian)

Yermolenko, A. M. (2020). Human condition in a globalized society of risks as a social and ethical problem. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (17), 110-118. DOI: (in English)




How to Cite

Borysenko, Y. S. (2023). How Does Homo Digitalis Empathize?. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (23), 70–79.