Miracle as a Message: Cosmological, Anthropological and Educational Implications





miracle, cosmology, religion, anthropology, semantics, communication, culture, post-secularity, education


The purpose of this article is to explain in religious, secular, and post-secular contexts the functional potential of conceptualizing the miracle as a text or message with a motivational effect. Theoretical basis. Max Weber, Ernst Tugendhat, Alexander Geppert and Till Kössler analysed the processes of enchantment and disenchantment of the world on a philosophical basis. The representatives of the Frankfurt school (Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin) and their followers describe the cultural processes of post-secularism (Jürgen Habermas, Peter Sloterdijk) in detail. The logic of cultural and social representation of amazing events and their descriptions can be realized by combining hermeneutic analysis with a functionalist approach based on the model of Niklas Luhmann and the discursive ethics of Karl-Otto Apel. Originality. Desired cultural, social and political situations in society often arise unexpectedly and suddenly, which provokes to characterize them as a miracle. However, at the basis of the emergence of such situations are the rules of social communication, in particular those that provide for asymmetric communication with questions that await answers. A miracle appears at the moment of transformation of asymmetric communication into a symmetrical one: each specific miracle-phenomenon needs its own metaphorical understanding and interpretation as a message. Conclusions. The article proposes an analysis of miracle phenomenon in its cosmological, anthropological and educational implications. Some tendencies fixed by communicative turn of the contemporary philosophy are also contributed to considering the miracle in its objective and subjective representations. The semantics of the miracle is analysed according to the relevant problem fields. The functionality of miracle is examined on its ability to show orientation for the contemporary societies with their tendency to post-secularity. The fusion of Pre-modernity and Late Modernity is taking into account when the semantics of miracle is described accordingly to their communication functionality. The enchanting and disenchanting dialectic is explained on semantics of miracle as a world and cosmic events.


Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (in English)

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. MIT Press. (in English)

Fuchs, G. (2022, January 16). Alles darf sein vor Gott. Christ in der Gegenwart, (3). (in German)

Geppert, A. C. T., & Kössler, T. (2011). Einleitung: Wunder der Zeitgeschichte. In A. C. T. Geppert & T. Kössler (Eds.), Wunder: Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 9-68). Suhrkamp. (in German)

Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: Eine Geschichte von Morgen (A. Wirthensohn, Trans.). München: C.H. Beck. (in German)

Hegel, G. W. F. (1981). Aus den Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion. In G. W. F. Hegel, Recht, Staat, Geschichte: Eine Auswahl aus seinen Werken (F. Bülow, Ed., pp. 479-497). Stuttgart: Kröner. (in German)

Honneth, A. (1995). The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy (C. W. Wright, Ed.). State University of New York Press. (in English)

Imorde, J. (2011). Tränen aus Gips. Zur politischen Dimension eines Marianischen Bildwunders in Syrakus. In A. C. T. Geppert & T. Kössler (Eds.), Wunder: Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 126-145). Suhrkamp. (in German)

Kultaieva, M. (2019). Filosofska pedahohika i dukhovne onovlennia suchasnykh suspilstv. Kharkiv: Panov A. M. (in Ukrainian)

Kultaieva, M., Radionova, N., & Panchenko, L. (2021). Cosmological and Cultural-Anthropological Turns in the Christian Philosophical Theology: Educational Implications in the Post-secular Contexts. Philosophy and Cosmology, 26, 90-99. DOI: http://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/26/7 (in English)

Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (Vol. 1). Suhrkamp. (in German)

Lukas, S. (2021, December 19). Alles nur Kopfsache? Christ in der Gegenwart, (51). (in German)

Midgley, M. (1992). Science as Salvation: A Modern Myth and its Meaning. Routledge. (in English)

Popovych, M. (2008). Hryhorii Skovoroda: filosofiia svobody. Kyiv: Maisternia Biletskykh. (in Ukrainian)

Rosa, H. (2019). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp. (in German)

Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Du mußt dein Leben ändern: Über Anthropotechnik. Suhrkamp. (in German)

Sloterdijk, P. (2020). Den Himmel zum Sprechen bringen: Über Theopoesie. Suhrkamp. (in German)

Tugendhat, E. (2007). Anthropologie statt Metaphysik. C.H. Beck. (in German)

Weiler, B. (2011). Mensch und Natur in der Kosmovision der Aguaruna und Huambisa und in den christlichen Schöpfungsaussagen. LIT. (in German)

Zander, H. (2011). Maria erscheint in Sievernich. Plausibilitätsbedingungen eines katholischen Wunders. In A. C. T. Geppert & T. Kössler (Eds.), Wunder: Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 146-176). Suhrkamp. (in German)




How to Cite

Kultaieva, M. D., & Panchenko, L. M. (2022). Miracle as a Message: Cosmological, Anthropological and Educational Implications. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (22), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271323