INTERPASSIVITY AS A SUBJECTIVE EFFECT OF MODERN MEDIA-CULTURE: TO THE STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Olena V. Khodus

Abstract


The purpose. In this article, research interest is fixed directly on the circumstances theming access personal / private as interpassivity practice of subjective life and creativity, which are mediated by modern media discourse. Methodology. Methodological base of research of contemporary experience of subjectivity is heuristic "ontological turn" in social theory, which allows to consider the subjectivity not as a reality (given), but as a procedural phenomenon, performativity, which exist in conditions of unstable ontologies, world without guarantees, indirect, thus, mass-media representations. Particular emphasis is placed on the deconstruction of traditional oppositions "objective/subjective", "public/private", "active/passive". As a result, a special interest in issues of privacy as "the place" in which the modern subject unstable ontology prefers to realize its self. Scientific novelty. It is proved that in the modern media culture, the subject is not so much a passive spectator, observer, collector information and events to represent relevant interested agents. He also actively reproduces itself in a form of "perceived privacy", which allows special mode of the experiences of private emotions "alone with everybody." Perceived privacy, although the individual reserves the right to individual control over personal space and personal statement (for example, through personal and individual electronic access to digital representations of reality), however, suggests certain techniques of "publication" themselves. It is the question of the interpassivity nature of such practices subjective life and creativity. Conclusions. Proposed research optics suggests that the person remains - the world-making being, who actively constructs their personal reality, however, when this reality is mediated by media representations, life world turns into a ready code, respectively, the active construction becomes superfluous. On the contrary, interpassivity as «activity through another» becomes the defining principle of relationship with the world.

Keywords


subjectivity; mediatization; privacy; performance; interpassivity

References


Bauman, Z. Globalizatsiia. Posledstviia dlia cheloveka i obshchestva [Globalization. The Human Consequences]. Moscow, Ves mir Publ., 2004. 188 р.

Bodriyyar, Zh. Prozrachnost zla [The Transparency of Evil]. Moscow, Dobrosvet Publ., 2006. 258 р.

Virno, Paolo. A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life. - New York: Semiotext (e)/ Foreign Agents, 2003 – 117 p.

Galkin, D. Sovremennye issledovaniya tsifrovoi kultury (vmesto predisloviia k perevodu fragmenta knigi Charli Gira "Tsifrovaia kultura") [The modern studies of digital culture]. Gumanitarnaia informatika: Otkrytyi mezhdistsiplinarnyi elektronnyi zhurnal, 2007, vol. 12. Available at: http://huminf.tsu.ru/e-jurnal/magazine/2/galkin2.htm.

Debor, G. Obshchestvo spektaklia [Spectacle Society].Moscow, Logos Publ., 2000. 224 р.

Zhizhek, S. Dobro pozhalovat v pustynyu Realnogo! [Welcome to the Desert of the Real]. Moscow, Fond Pragmatika kultury Publ., 2002. 160 p.

Zhizhek, S. Chuma fantaziy [Plague of Fantasies]. Kharkov Gumanitarnyy tsentr Publ., 2014. 388 р.

Ilin, I. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [The Poststrukturalizm. Deconstruction. Рostmodernism]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1996. 413 p.

Maklyuen, M. Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniia cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Moscow, Kanon-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2003. 256 p.

Svendsen, L. Filosofiia skuki [The philosophy of boredom]. Moscow, Progress, Traditsiya Publ., 2003. 256 р.

Khorkkhaymer, M., Adorno, T. Dialektika prosveshcheniia [Dialectic of Enlightenment].Moscow, 1997. 456 р.


GOST Style Citations


1. Бауман, З. Глобализация. Последствия для человека и общества [Текст] / З. Бауман. – М.: Изд-во «Весь мир», 2004. – 188 с.

2. Бодрийяр, Ж. Прозрачность зла [Текст] / Ж. Бодрийяр. – М.: Добросвет, КДУ., 2006. – 258 с.

3. Virno, Paolo. A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life. - New York: Semiotext (e) / Foreign Agents, 2003 – 117 s.

4. Галкин, Д.В. Современные исследования цифровой культуры (вместо предисловия к переводу фрагмента книги Чарли Гира "Цифровая культура") [Электронный ресурс] / Д.В. Галкин // Гуманитарная информатика: Открытый междисципли-нарный электронный журнал. –2007. – Вып.2. – Режим доступа: http://huminf.tsu.ru/ejurnal/magazine/2/galkin2.htm – Загл. с экрана.

5. Дебор, Г. Общество спектакля [Текст] / Г. Дебор – М.: Логос, 2000. – 224 с.

6. Жижек, С. Добро пожаловать в пустыню Реального! [Текст] / С. Жижек // 13 опытов о Ленине. – М.: Ad Marginem, 2001.– С. 196-212.

7. Жижек, С. Чума фантазий [Текст] / С. Жижек: пер. с англ. – Х.: Изд-во Гуманитарный Центр, 2014. – 388 с.

8. Ильин, И.П. Постструктурализм. Деконструктивизм. Постмодернизм [Текст] / И.П. Ильин. – М.: Интрада, 1996. – 413 с.

9. Маклюэн, М. Понимание медиа: Внешние расширения человека [Текст] / М. Маклюэн. – М.: Канон-пресс-Ц, Кучково поле, 2003. – 464 с.

10. Свендсен, Л. Философия скуки [Текст] / Л. Свендсен. – Москва Прогресс – Традиция, 2003. – 256 с.

11. Хоркхаймер, М. Диалектика просвещения [Текст] / М. Хоркхаймер, Т. Адорно. – М. – СПб., 1997. – 456 с.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2014/24994

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.