Divine Evolution: Empedocles’ Anthropology





Empedocles, immortality, soul, divinity, anthropology, metempsychosis, evolution, elements, memory


Purpose. Reconstruction of Empedocles’ doctrine from the point of view of philosophical anthropology. Theoretical basis. Methodological basis of the article is the anthropological comprehending of Empedocles’ text fragments presented in the historical-philosophical context. Originality. Cognition of nature in Ancient Greece was far from the ideal of the objective knowledge formed in modern times, cognition of the world as it exists before man and independently of him. Whatever the ancient philosophers talked about, man was always in the center of their attention. I proposed an anthropological version of the interpretation of the doctrine of Empedocles, within the framework of which various elements of his concept fit into a consistent model. Conclusions. Empedocles’ anthropology is based on the recognition of several fundamental things. First of all, there is no death. Second, there is no fundamental difference between human and celestial. This line is conventional and under certain conditions one can overcome it. Cod can become a human (for example, for a deed unworthy of a deity), and a human can become God. Teaching of evolution is also double. Not only physical shell evolves, keeping only the most adapted species, but the soul too. The latter can both ascend to the gods and go down to the bushes and fish. Purification of the soul and mastering the magic of the elements gives an impetus for a correct direction of evolution. Empedocles is an anthropologist-practitioner, who shows by his example that a human can cope with all the elements and reach divinity. He chose (or convinced himself that he chose) the elemental ingredients for penetrating the Fortunate Isles, leaving the instructions on how to become God.


Arnold, M. (1890). Empedocles on Etna. In Poems (pp. 216-254). New York, NY: Macmillan. (in English)

Bernabé, A., & Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I. (2008). Instructions for the Netherworld: The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden: Brill. (in English)

Bremmer, J. N. (1994). Greek Religion. Glasgow: Oxford University Press. (in English)

Burkert, W. (1985). Greek Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (in English)

Chitwood, A. (2004). Death by Philosophy: The Biographical Tradition in the Life and Death of the Archaic Philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus. University of Michigan Press. (in English)

Coates, C. F. (2018). Cosmic Democracy or Cosmic Monarchy? Empedocles in Plato’s Statesman. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought, 35(2), 418-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340174 (in English)

Coughlin, S. (2021). Cohesive Causes in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Medicine. In C. Thumiger (Ed.), Holism in Ancient Medicine and Its Reception (pp. 237-267). Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004443143_012 (in English)

Diogenes Laertius. (1925). Books 6-10 (R. D. Hicks, Trans.). In Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (in English)

Graf, F., & Johnston, S. I. (2007). Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London: Routledge. (in English)

Halapsis, A. V. (2020). Man and Logos: Heraclitus’ Secret. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 17, 119-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.206726 (in English)

Hölderlin, F. (2008). The Death of Empedocles: A Mourning-Play (D. F. Krell, Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. (in English)

Horky, P. S. (2019). When did Kosmos become the Kosmos? In P. S. Horky (Ed.), Cosmos in the Ancient World (pp. 22-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (in English)

Jones, A. (2017). A Portable Cosmos: Revealing the Antikythera Mechanism, Scientific Wonder of the Ancient World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (in English)

Kenny, A. (2006). An Illustrated Brief History of Western Philosophy (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. (in English)

Kenny, A. (2008). From Empedocles to Wittgenstein: Historical Essays in Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (in English)

Long, A. (2017). Immortality in Empedocles. Apeiron, 50(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2015-0054 (in English)

McKirahan, R. D. (2010). Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (in English)

Nietzsche, F. (2006). The Pre-Platonic Philosophers (G. Whitlock, Trans.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (in English)

Parker, R. (2005). Polytheism and Society at Athens. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (in English)

Pindar. (2007). The Complete Odes (A. Verity, Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (in English)

Price, S. (1999). Religions of the Ancient Greeks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (in English)

Russell, B. (1947). History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin. (in English)

Sissa, G., & Detienne, M. (2000). The Daily Life of the Greek Gods (J. Lloyd, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (in English)

Vamvacas, C. J. (2009). The Founders of Western Thought – The Presocratics. A diachronic parallelism between Presocratic Thought and Philosophy and the Natural Sciences. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9791-1 (in English)

Versnel, H. S. (2011). Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology. Leiden: Brill. (in English)

Wright, M. R. (1997). Empedocles. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy: From the Beginning to Plato (Vol. 1, pp. 161-191). London: Routledge. (in English)




How to Cite

Halapsis, A. V. (2021). Divine Evolution: Empedocles’ Anthropology. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (19), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i19.236052