From Anthropocentrism to Care for Our Common Home: Ethical Response to the Environmental Crisis




anthropocentrism, environmental crisis, common home, care, responsibility, solidarity, holistic ethics


Purpose of the study is explication of ethical and existential conditions of realization of human responsibility for the protection and recreation of the environment on a scale of the common world with all the other living beings. The crisis of the environment is the crisis of human morality. For responsible environmental management, it is necessary to form the ecological consciousness of society and reinterpret the anthropocentrism on the ethical foundations. The theoretical basis of the research is the analysis of ethical and existential dimensions of understanding of the human environment ranging from the sphere of the home and the natural environment to the dimension of the common world of people and all the entities. The work clarifies the genesis of the concept of home from the ancient "oikos", household to the idea of home as a "hub", a base for mental and physical mobility in the contemporary technosphere. Correspondent to the transformation of the living world of mankind is the concept of communication and universal discourse of norms and values of human coexistence of J. Habermas, К.-О. Apel, D. Böhler, W. Kuhlmann, and others. The domain of the ecological consciousness and behaviour also requires motivation at the level of human feelings, beliefs, and convictions, which is represented by the philosophic and religious thought of H. Jonas, O. Leopold, K. M. Меуеr-Abich, A. Naess, the pope Francis, and others. As the result, the study proves the relevance of the concept of care about the common home based on the recognition of the value of the existence of all beings. Originality. The study explicates the genesis and meaning of the ethos of the common home with values of love, care, openness, solidarity, freedom, and responsibility which is proved to be the ethical and existential condition of the solution of the environmental crisis. The traditional anthropocentrism is reinterpreted towards the duty of people to be the centre of the responsibility for the existence of all beings that requires both reason and care. Conclusions. The ethics of care for our common home completes the moral duty of people as providers of the universal discourse who represent the interests of all beings. Concern for the preservation of the human environment and of all creation makes it possible for humanity to realize its universal responsibility in the world. The contemporaneous science and religious thought modify anthropocentrism to the holistic ethical understanding of human’s mission to be responsible for all beings.


Aristotle. (2003). Politics (O. Kysliuk, Trans.). Кyiv: Osnovy. (in Ukrainian)

Bazaluk, O., & Balinchenko, S. (2020). The Ethics Laws as a Basis for Building a Cosmic Civilization. The Sofia Republic. Philosophy and Cosmology, 24, 131-139. DOI: (in English)

Francis. (2015). Laudato Si’ (encyclical letter). Retrieved from (in English)

Francis. (2020). Fratelli Tutti (encyclical letter). Retrieved from (in English)

Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. (in German)

Horx-Strathern, O. (2017). Is our definition of home evolving? Retrieved from (in English)

Jonas, H. (2001). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technological Age (Trans.). Кyiv: Libra. (in Ukrainian)

Krueger, J., & Osler, L. (2019). Engineering Affect: Emotion Regulation, the Internet, and the Techno-Social Niche. Philosophical Topics, 47(2), 205-231. DOI: (in English)

Kyselov, M. M., Hardashuk, T. V., & Hrabovskyi, S. I. (2015). Antroposfera: Suchasni interpretatsii: Monohrafiia. Nizhyn: Vydavets PP Lysenko M. M. (in Ukrainian)

Liakh, V. V. (2020). Kontsepty humanizmu v filosofii XX stolittia: Riznovydy y evoliutsiia. In Liudyna v suchasnomu sviti: Sotsialno-filosofskyi ta kulturno-antropolohichnyi vymiry: Monohrafiia (pp. 79-106). Кyiv: Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

Lyubiviy, Y. V., & Samchuk, R. V. (2020). Virtualization of identity in the context of self-realization of a personality. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 18, 102-112. DOI: (in English)

Меуеr-Abich, К. М. (2004). Revolt on defence of nature. From environment to the common world (A. Yermolenko, Trans.). Kyiv: Libra. (in Ukrainian)

Muliarchuk, Y. (2019). Filosofiia i pedahohika poklykannia: Monohrafiia. Kyiv: Dukh i litera. (in Ukrainian)

Spence, E. H. (2011). The philosophy of home. Neos Kosmos. Retrieved from (in English)

Tine, R. van. (2017). Reflections, Analysis, and Significance for Human Ecology of Pope Francis’s Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. Human Ecology Review, 23(1), 141-178. (in English)

Uexküll, J. von. (2010). A Foray Into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With A Theory of Meaning. University of Minnesota Press. (in English)

Winkler, R. (2017). Dwelling and Hospitality: Heidegger and Hölderlin. Research in Phenomenology, 47(3), 366-387. (in English)

Yermolenko, A. M. (2010). Social ethics and ecology. Human dignity-respect for nature: Monohrafiia. Kyiv: Libra. (in Ukrainian)

Young, I. M. (1997). House and Home: Feminist Variations on a Theme. In Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy (pp. 134-164). Princeton University Press. (in English)




How to Cite

Muliarchuk, Y. I. (2021). From Anthropocentrism to Care for Our Common Home: Ethical Response to the Environmental Crisis. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (19), 88–96.