DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i18.221425

ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.

T. N. Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian, S. A. Ostapenko

Abstract


Purpose. The purpose of the study is to show the connection of romanticism with the anthropological doctrine that goes back to Hegelianism and Kantianism, and at the same time – with the concepts of the future, structuralism and postmodernism. Theoretical basis. The man is a central figure of the Romantic literary, therefore it makes sense to single out romantic human anthropological doctrine and the image of man associated with a specific historical and cultural era called the "epoch of romanticism"; to show that many romantic philosophical positions remained relevant to the basic foundations of contemporary anthropological research and coincide with it in analytical and critical thinking about a man, a person, his historical and evolutionary fate. Originality. The romantic worldview determined the specifics of anthropological discourse, both logical and illogical, remaining symbols and attaching, as for example, a real historical anecdote, a popular history, a philosophical thought, a myth, a famous literary episode and the arts multiplied by creative inspiration and imagination. This tendency determined the fragmentation of thinking and the scientific image of man as a dual being, nevertheless, presented and described in all the variety of relations with the world and with himself, that allows us to call this area of thought "the romantic human science". Conclusions. Structural analysis of numerous romantic texts allows us to draw the following conclusion: with mythopoetic imagery and anthropological thought about a man, romantic writers introduced the reader to any wisdom, to philosophical understanding of their human essence, to past and modern teachings, in a way processed antique, medieval and enlightening views, in which an important place was given to reflections on the place of man in nature, society, and history. Correlating the well-known statements about a person as a descendant of the "old Adam", "person", "personality", "soul", with the modern idea of historical and social development, about the evolution of the consciousness of a person who revealed himself as an individual in modern times, with scientific and aesthetic views, the writers of the first half of the XIX century gave romantic thought anthropological meaning and, in fact, laid the foundations of historical, social, psychological, cultural and psychoanalytic anthropology.


Keywords


romanticism; human being; human study; personality philosophy; philosophy of the "alter"; personal motives; individualism; author’s myth; binarity; simulacrum

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Arrous, M. (2019). Lamartine ou la vie lyrique, A. Foglia et L. Zimmermann. Studi Francesi, (188 (LXIII | II)), 368-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.19931 (in French)

Bandrovska, O. T. (2016). Identychnist Inshoho v anhliiskomu modernistskomu romani: Tilo poza normoiu kriz mizhdystsyplinarni pidkhody. From Baroque to Postmodernism: A Journal of literary Studies, 20, 134-140. (in Ukrainian)

Batyushkov, K. N. (1977). Stikhotvoreniya. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (in Russian)

Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et simulation. Galilee. (in French)

Baudrillard, J. (2000). Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert. Moscow: Dobrosvet. (in Russian)

Besant, A. (1991). Ezotericheskoe khristianstvo, ili Malye misterii. Moscow: ART+N. (in Russian)

Byron, G. G. (1974). Palomnichestvo Chayld Garolda. In Sochineniya (Vol. 1, pp. 141-297). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (in Russian)

Charchare, H. (2017). Proust et Platon. Convergences linguistiques, érotiques et philosophiques. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité. (in French)

Dahan, J. R. (2019). Compte rendu des Cahiers d’études nodiéristes, 2017–2, № 4 : "Charles Nodier et la presse de son temps". Revue d’histoire littéraire de la France. Retrieved from http://srhlf.free.fr/PDF/Charles_Nodier_et_la_presse_de_son_temps.pdf (in French)

Duarte, L. F. D. (2004). The romantic drive and human sciences in the western culture (La pulsion romantique et les sciences humaines en occident). Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 19(55), 5-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-69092004000200001 (in English)

Dyakonova, N. Y. (2001). Tomas de Quincey – povestvovatel. In Confession of an English Opium-Eater (pp. 5-24). St. Petersburg: Azbuka. (in Russian)

Foucault, M. (2015). O "Dialogakh" Russo. In N. T. Pakhsaryan (Ed.), Michel Foucault i literatura (pp. 7-27). St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russian)

Fridman, N. V. (1967). Batyushkov i romanticheskoe dvizhenie. In Problemy romantizma (pp. 92-153). Moscow. (in Russian)

Khmil, V., & Malivskyi, A. (2018). The Problem of Forms of Completing the Copernicus Revolution in Modern Cartesian Science. Philosophy and Cosmology, 21, 131-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/21/14 (in English)

King, M. J. (2019). Object-Oriented Baudrillard? Withdrawal and Symbolic Exchange. Open Philosophy, 2(1), 75-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0008 (in English)

Nerval, G. de. (1972). Aurélia. Les Chimères. La Pandora. Paris: Le Livre de Poche. (in French)

Potnitseva, T. N. (2019). Angliyskie romantiki i russkie miratores ("Korsar" Bayrona v interpretatsii V. Olina). In Izbrannye istorii iz istorii literatury (pp. 11-22). Dnepr: DNU. (In Russian)

Putivtseva, N. K. (2019). Problematyka martynikanskoi ta antylskoi samobutnosti u tvorchosti Eduara Hlissana. (Avtoreferat dysertatsii kandydata filolohichnykh nauk). Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv. (in Ukrainian)

Quincey, T. de. (1994). Confessions of an English Opium-Eater. Wordsworth Editions Limited. (in English)

Quincey, T. de. (2001). Confession of an English Opium-Eater. St. Petersburg: Azbuka. (in Russian)

Rozin, V. M. (2019). Not only about Love: About Philosophers, their Lovers and Time (Reflections on the Book "Philosophical Emanations of Love"). History of Philosophy, 24(2), 126-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2019-24-2-126-135 (in Russian)

Schlegel, F. (1983). Estetika. Filosofiya. Kritika (Vol. 2). Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)

Schreider, N. S. (2011). Iz istoriko-literaturnogo naslediya. Dnepropetrovsk: ART-PRESS. (in Russian)

Shervashidze, V. V. (2016). Drama "literaturnogo soznaniya": Ot romantizma k postmodernizmu. In Literatura i ideologiya: Vek dvadtsatyy (pp. 365-371). MAKS Press. (in Russian)

Vigny, A. de. (1964). Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Seuil. (in French)

Vigny, A. de. (1987). Izbrannoe. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)

Wordsworth, W., & Coleridge, S. T. (2003). Lyrical Ballads and Other Poems. Wordsworth Editions Limited. (in English)

Yurchuk, O. O. (2016). Heohrafichne myslennia v khudozhnii literaturi. Kontaktni zony v antropolohii i teorii literatury. Khudozhni fenomeny v istorii svitovoi literatury: Perekhid movy v pysmennytstvo ("Horyzont ochikuvannia"): Tezy dopovidei II mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii, April 8-9, 2016, Kharkiv, 99. (in Ukrainian)

Zelensky, V. (1995). Posleslovie. In C. G. Jung, Analiticheskaya psikhologiya: Proshloe i nastoyashchee (p. 291). Moscow. (In Russian)

Zenkin, S. (2000). Jean Baudrillard: Vremya simulyakrov. In J. Baudrillard, Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert (pp. 5-40). Moscow: Dobrosvet. (in Russian)

Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian, T. N. (2015). Frantsuzskaya romanticheskaya literatura 1820-kh gg.: Struktura mifopoeticheskogo teksta: Monografiya. Dnepropetrovsk, NGU. (in Russian)


GOST Style Citations


Arrous M. Lamartine ou la vie lyrique, A. Foglia et L. Zimmermann. Studi Francesi. 2019. Iss. 188 (LXIII | II). P. 368–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.19931

Бандровська О. Т. Iдентичнiсть Iншого в англiйському модернiстському романi: тiло поза нормою крiзь мiждисциплiнарнi пiдходи. Від бароко до постмодернізму. 2016. Вип. 20. С. 134–140.

Батюшков К. Н. Стихотворения. Москва : Худож. лит., 1977. 206 с.

Baudrillard J. Simulacres et simulation. Galilee, 1981. 240 p.

Бодрийяр Ж. Ж. Символический обмен и смерть. Москва : Добросвет, 2000. 387 с.

Безант А. Эзотерическое христианство, или Малые мистерии. Москва : АРТ+N, 1991. 195 с.

Байрон Д. Г. Паломничество Чайльд Гарольда. Сочинения : в 3 т. Москва : Худож. лит., 1974. Т. 1. С. 141–297.

Charchare H. Proust et Platon. Convergences linguistiques, érotiques et philosophiques. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2017. 576 p.

Dahan J. R. Compte rendu des Cahiers d’études nodiéristes, 2017–2, № 4 : "Charles Nodier et la presse de son temps". Revue d’histoire littéraire de la France, 2019. URL: http://srhlf.free.fr/PDF/Charles_Nodier_et_la_presse_de_son_temps.pdf

Duarte L. F. D. The romantic drive and human sciences in western culture (La pulsion romantique et les sciences humaines en occident). Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais. 2004. Vol. 19. Iss. 55. P. 5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-69092004000200001

Дьяконова Н. Я. Томас де Квинси – повествователь. Исповедь англичанина, употреблявшего опиум / Т. де. Квинси. Санкт-Петербург : Азбука, 2001. С. 5–24.

Фуко М. О "Диалогах" Руссо. Мишель Фуко и литература / под ред. Н. Т. Пахсарьян. Санкт-Петербург : Алетейя, 2015. С. 7–27.

Фридман Н. В. Батюшков и романтическое движение. Проблемы романтизма. Москва, 1967. C. 92–153.

Khmil V., Malivskyi A. The Problem of Forms of Completing the Copernicus Revolution in Modern Cartesian Science. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2018. Vol. 21. P. 131–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/21/14

King M. J. Objekt-Oriented Baudrillard? Withdrawal and Symbolic Exchange. Open Philosophy. 2019. Vol. 2. Iss. 1. P. 75–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0008

De Nerval G. Aurelia. Les Chimères. La Pandora. Paris : Le Livre de Poche, 1972. 268 p.

Потницева Т. Н. Английские романтики и русские miratores ("Корсар" Байрона в интерпретации В. Олина). Избранные истории из истории литературы. Днепр : ДНУ, 2019. С. 11–22.

Путiвцева Н. К. Проблематика мартинiканської та антильської самобутностi у творчостi Едуара Глiссана : автореф. дис. … канд. філол. наук. Чорномор. нац. ун-т ім. Петра Могили. Миколаїв, 2019. 20 с.

De Quincey T. Confessions of an English Opium-Eater. Wordsworth Editions Limited, 1994. 312 p.

Де Квинси Т. Исповедь англичанина, употреблявшего опиум. Санкт-Петербург : Азбука, 2001. 224 с.

Розин В. М. Не только о любви: о философах, их возлюбленных и времени (Размышления по поводу книги "Философские эманации любви"). История философии. 2019. Т. 24. № 2. С. 126–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2019-24-2-126-135

Шлегель Ф. Эстетика. Философия. Критика : в 2 т. Москва : Искусство, 1983. Т. 2. 448 с.

Шрейдер Н. С. Из историко-литературного наследия. Днепропетровск : АРТ-ПРЕСС, 2011. 418 с.

Шервашидзе В. В. Драма "литературного сознания": от романтизма к постмодернизму. Литература и идеология. Век двадцатый. МАКС Пресс, 2016. С. 365–371.

De Vigny A. Oeuvres complètes. Paris : Seuil, 1964. 661 p.

Де Виньи А. Избранное. Москва : Искусство, 1987. 606 с.

Wordsworth W., Coleridge S. T. Lyrical Ballads and Other Poems. Wordsworth Editions Limited, 2003. 210 p.

Юрчук О. О. Географiчне мислення в художнiй лiтературi. Контактнi зони в антропологiї i теорiї лiтератури. Художнi феномени в iсторiї свiтової лiтератури: перехiд мови в письменництво ("Горизонт очiкування"). Тези доповідей II мiжнар. наук. конф. (Харкiв, 8-9 квiтня 2016 р.). Харківський національний університет імені В. Н. Каразіна. Харкiв, 2016. С. 99.

Зеленский В. Послесловие. Аналитическая психология: Прошлое и настоящее / К. Г. Юнг. Москва, 1995. С. 291.

Зенкин С. Жан Бодрийяр: время симулякров. Символический обмен и смерть / Ж. Бодрийяр. Москва : Добросвет, 2000. С. 5–40.

Жужгина-Аллахвердян Т. Н. Французская романтическая литература 1820-х гг.: структура мифопоэтического текста : монография. Днепропетровск : НГУ, 2015. 280 с.





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.