THE CONCEPT "SINN DES LEBENS" IN PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.206716

Keywords:

Sinn des Lebens, meaning of life, significance, meaninglessness, analytical philosophy, existentialism, absurdity, psychoanalysis, logotherapy, existential frustration, supernaturalism, naturalism, nihilism

Abstract

Purpose. The paper considered the explication of the concept of "Sinn des Lebens" within the framework of Western philosophy and psychology of the ХІХ-ХХІ centuries. On the basis of this, the role of this concept in contemporary theoretical discussions and psychological and psychotherapeutic practices is understood. Theoretical basis. The authors believe that understanding the concept of "Sinn des Lebens" is possible only based on the synthesis of modern analytical philosophy methods with the methodological guidelines of modern psychology, in particular logotherapy. Originality. The authors have proved that the problem of "meaning of life" is not an "eternal problem" of philosophy, but arises only in the early nineteenth century as a reflection on European secularization and widespread individualistic values and becomes extremely relevant gaining different interpretations at the beginning of the twentieth century based on the crisis of the sensory values of modern man. Conclusions. The concept of "Sinn des Lebens" originated in the philosophy of the German Romantics and gained philosophical significance only in the works by Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Russian philosophy and literature (especially L. Tolstoy) give priority to the meaning of life in ethical and anthropological studies, focusing on its religious intentions. Analytical philosophy and existentialism appear to be diametrically opposed to the life-purpose anthropological problems, but they attempt to solve this problem by understanding the absurdity of human existence and language from different angles of view. The most reasonable concept of meaning in psychology can be considered Frankl’s logotherapy, which, despite certain drawbacks, remains the most significant in modern Western psychology. Modern philosophical studies on the problems of the meaning of life, despite their prudent analyticity and systematic nature, have not found credible criteria and means of human life self-reflection yet and have further incentives to develop their methodological and philosophical considerations. However, the diversity of interpretations of the concept of "meaning of life" that exists in modern scientific literature needs further reflection.

Author Biographies

V. Y. Popov, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University

Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University (Vinnytsia, Ukraine), e-mail popovmak@ukr.net

Е. V. Popova, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University

Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University (Vinnytsia, Ukraine), e-mail popovaelena2667@gmail.com

References

Adler, A. (1973). Der Sinn des Lebens. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbucn Verlag. (in English)

Bazaluk, O., & Blazhevych, T. (2015). Modern Basics of the Philosophy of Education. Future Human Image, 2(5), 93-100. (in Russian)

Becker, C. (2018). Dangers and Directions in the Future of World Logotherapy. The Future of Logotherapy: 4th International Congress on Logotherapy & Existential Analysis, August 28-September 1, 2018, Moscow, 6-9. (in English)

Camus, A. (1955). The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (in English)

Camus, A. (2006). Neither Victims nor Executioners: The Century of Fear. In Camus at Combat. Writing 1944-1947 (pp. 257-260). Prinston University Press.(in English)

Chukhray, E. (2015). The Ultimate Purpose of Life and the Meaning in Life: History of Philosophy and Limits of Rational Reconstruction. Sententiae, 32(1), 143-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22240/sent32.01.143 (in Ukrainian)

Dilthey, W. (1954). Essence of Philosophy. S. A. Emery, & W. T. Emery, Trans. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. (in English)

Frank, S. (1994). Smysl zhizni. In N. K. Gavryushin (Ed.), Smysl zhizni: Antologiya (pp. 489-583). Moscow: Prohress-Kultura. (in Russian)

Frankl, V. (1962). The Will to Meaning. New American Library. (in English)

Freud, S. (2000). Letters of Sigmund Freud. Dover Publications. (in English)

Freud, S. (2002). Civilization and Its Discontents. London: Penguin. (in English)

Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Either/Or: A Fragment of Life. A. Hannay, Trans. Penguin. (in English)

Metz, T. (2013). Meaning in life: An analytic study. Oxford: Oxford UP. (in English)

Metz, T. (2019). God, Soul and the Meaning of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108558136 (in English)

Morioka, M. (2015). Is Meaning in Life Comparable?: From the Viewpoint of 'The Heart of Meaning in Life'. Journal of Philosophy of Life, 5(3), 50-65. (in English)

Nietzsche, F. (1999). The Anti-Christ. H. L. Mencken, Trans. See Sharp Press. (in English)

Safonik, L. (2016). Buttievist sensu liudskoho zhyttia: Monohrafiia. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

Schlegel, F. (2014). The Aesthetic and Miscellaneous Works of Frederick von Schlegel. E. J. Millington, Trans. Cambridge University Press. (in English)

Schopenhauer, A. (2009). The World as Will and Representation. Köln: Anaconda Verlag. (in English)

Tolstoy, L. N. (1983). Ispoved. In Sobranie sochineniy (Vol. 16, pp. 106-165). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (in Russian)

Watson, P. (2014). The Age of Nothing: How We Have Sought to Live Since the Death of God. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.(in English)

Wittgenstein, L. (1960). The blue and brown books. Harper & Brothers. (in English)

Downloads

Published

2020-06-29

How to Cite

Popov, V. Y., & Popova Е. V. (2020). THE CONCEPT "SINN DES LEBENS" IN PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (17), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.206716

Issue

Section

TOPICAL ISSUES OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY