PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF A PERSON’S SELF-REFLECTION IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNAL DIALOGUE (BASED ON "THE DISPUTE OF A MAN WITH HIS BA")
Keywords:self-reflection, internal dialogue, philosophical type of thinking, "Axial Age", crisis states, Ba, Interlocutor, dialogical Self
AbstractPurpose. The study is aimed at considering self-reflection through an analysis of the features of internal dialogue in ancient texts (XXII-XXI centuries BC) in order to identify signs of human’s mythological and philosophical thinking. Theoretical basis of the work is the contemplation of a person’s self-reflection in the context of his internal dialogue, through which his own human existence, his subjective and creative comprehension of the world manifest. New meanings are created and shared with others in this mental space, in particular, in crisis periods of personal and social life. Therefore, the ancient Egyptian vision of man’s nature, consciousnesses and dialogism of the Self is viewed through the prism of modern philosophical concepts and as the basis for the emergence of a philosophical worldview itself. Originality. The analysis from the viewpoint of the philosophical anthropology in the text "The Dispute of a Man with His Ba" showed the opportunity of considering it not only in the context of internal dialogue, but also as a confirmed internal dialogue, which expresses itself in external speech. Comparing the mythical thinking of a man in his cohesiveness with others and the philosophical thinking of a dialogical Self, the authors come to the conclusion that it is necessary to distinguish between internal dialogues with oneself and with the introjects of others, which can be either Double or Interlocutor. It has been revealed that internal dialogues in ancient times played an important role both in structuring social chaos and in overcoming personal crisis states (from existential to clinical states of altered consciousness). This is precisely from such self-reflection that philosophy emerges as a certain discourse and a new type of thinking. Conclusions. The analysis of the text "The Dispute of a Man with His Ba" speaks about the emergence of philosophical discourse in the XXII-XXI centuries BC, on the basis of which we can conclude concerning the earlier, in comparison with K. Jaspers’s definition, the transition of mankind from the cognitive revolution to a new phase of the development.
Assmann, J. (1998). Mono-, Pan-, And Cosmotheism: Thinking the 'One' in Egyptian Theology. Orient, 33, 130-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5356/orient1960.33.130 (in English)
Bolshakov, A. O. (2001). Chelovek i ego Dvoynik. Izobrazitelnost i mirovozzrenie v Egipte Starogo tsarstva. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya. (in Russian)
Chobanov, Y. (2015). New Interpretation of "The Dialog of a man and his Ba". The Journal of Egyptological Studies, IV, 84-97. (in English)
Endel, M. (2001). Sladkiy Zapad: Predislovie k perevodu. Solnechnoe Spletenie, 14-15. (in Russian)
Escolano-Poveda, M. (2017). New Fragments of Papyrus Berlin 3024. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 144(1), 16-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zaes-2017-0002 (in English)
Hays, C. B. (2015). A Covenant with Death: Death in the Iron Age II and Its Rhetorical Uses in Proto-Isaiah. Eerdmans. (in English)
Ishchuk, N. V. (2018). Suchasna pravoslavna teolohiia dialohu: Monohrafiia. Kyiv: PF «PP "Foliant"». (in Ukrainian)
Jaspers, K. (1994). Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M. Levina, Trans. from German. Moscow: Respublika. (in Russian)
Jaspers, K. (1996). Vom Sinn der Geschichte. A. Hordiienko, Trans. In V. V. Liakh, & V. S. Pazenok, Suchasna zarubizhna filosofiia. Techii i napriamy: Khrestomatiia (pp. 184-210). Kyiv: Vakler. (in Ukrainian)
Meijers, F., & Hermans, H. (2017). Dialogical Self Theory in Education: An Introduction. In The Dialogical Self Theory in Education (pp. 1-17). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62861-5_1 (in English)
Ouellet, B. (2004). Le Désillusionné et son ba du Papyrus Berlin 3024. L’herméneutique d’une expérience ontophanique. Montréal: Université de Montréal. (in French)
Smith, A. (2015). Between facts and myth: Karl Jaspers and the actuality of the axial age. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 76(4), 315-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1136794 (in English)
Spirina, S. A. (2006). Some aspects of translation and interpretation of "The Dispute between a Man and his Ba" (Papyrus Berlin 3024). In Drevniy Egipet. Sbornik trudov Assotsiatsii po izucheniyu Drevnego Egipta "MAAT" (pp. 137-141). (in English)
Vittori, S. (2018). Two Direct Speeches in the Last Two Poems of the 'Dialogue between a Man and His Ba' (pBerlin 3024, cc. 138-140 and cc. 144-145): A Note of Translation. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(4), 183-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2018.060404 (in English)
Žabkar, L. V. (1968). A Study of the Ba Concept in Ancient Egyptian Texts. The University of Chicago Press. (in English)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).