POST-RELIGION: TRADITIONALISTS’ ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2013/19777Keywords:
post-religion, Post-modernity, Tradition, Sacred, traditionalism, simulacrum, deconstruction, rhizome, fission, mimicry, desacralizationAbstract
Aim of the study is to describe the phenomenon of post-religion as a specific spiritual sphere of the Post-modernity. Methodology. In the introduction analyzed a variety of methodological approaches, opening his inadequacy applied to the spiritual sphere of Post-modernity: «classic» religious studies, religious studies of traditional spiritual movements and the post-modern religious studies, partly produced Traditionalist school, could - according to the author's hypothesis - become a methodological basis for the most complete analysis of post-religion. Scientific novelty. In the main part of the article crystallized the authorized concept of post-religion, its relation with traditional and religious spiritual realms. Post-religion is positioned as the top of secularism enshrined in the departure from the straight and aggressive secularism of the Modernity, but without recourse to Tradition. Post-religion a simulation spirituality, skillfully imitating the outer areas of traditional spirituality and creates a planar religiosity, radically preventing attached to the vertical line of Traditions. In this regard, are the main artificially selected parameters of post-religion: deconstruction, splitting, virtualization, and collage. Deconstruction is a transformation of spirituality in semiotic set for egocentric selectivity of modern believer. Post-religion’s splitting is deprivation of spirituality center, destruction of sacral Center and the transformation of spirituality in the plane on which the intellectual and sensual wandering post-believer from one semiotic island to another. Virtualization is a displacement field of spiritual tension in a completely virtual area, isolated from the natural conditions of existence and created as his replacement, network discussion sites and galleries. Collage is an arbitrary combination of different semiotic pieces of Tradition with the aim of creating a believable picture of tradition; it is collage leads to archaic forms of modern spirituality. Findings. Thus, based on the above study phenomenological illustrations, can declare one can argue that Post-modernity is much wider than the decadent direction of the culture is a radical shift of spirituality, the top of desacralization.
References
Averyanov V.V. Sverim ponyatiya (opredeleniya ot protivnogo). Konservatizm-traditsionalizm-natsionalizm [Check your concepts]. Fond Pitirima Sorokina [M., 2007] URL: http://www.sorokinfond.ru/index.php?id=286 (data obrashcheniya 26.09.12).
Ankersmit F.R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory [History and Tropology : The Rise and Fall of Metaphor]. – Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2003. 496 p.
Antropov V.V. Etika i religiya v "bezreligioznom khristianstve" Ditrikha Bonkheffera [Ethics and Religion in "non-religious Christianity" Dietrich Bonhoeffer] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2005. – № 6. p. 58-72.
Bart R. Ot proizvedeniya k tekstu [From work to text]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. p. 413-432.
Bachinin V.A. Postmodernizm i khristianstvo [Postmodernism and Christianity]. 2007. – № 4. p. 65-79.
Burde P. Sotsiologiya politiki [Social policy]. Moscow, Socio-Logos Publ., 1993. 263 p.
Burde P. Sotsiologiya sotsialnogo prostranstva [Sociology of social space]. SPb, Aleteyya Publ., 2007. 288 p.
Vatoropin A.S., Olkhovikov K.M. Perspektivy sekulyarizma i religii v epokhu postmoderna [Prospects of secularism and religion in the postmodern era]. 2002. – № 2. p. 136-145.
Vattimo D. Nasilie – eto to, chto prepyatstvuet zadavat voprosy [Violence - is what keeps asking questions]. Moscow, 1997-2011. URL: http://index.org.ru/infospace/398vatt.html (data obrashcheniya 26.09.12).
Genon R. Krizis sovremennogo mira. [The crisis of the modern world]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2008. 784 p.
Debor G.-E. Obshchestvo spektaklya [Society of the Spectacle]. Moscow., Logos Publ., 2000. 184 p.
Delez Zh. Platon i simulyakr [Plato and the simulacrum]. Philosophy.ru [M., 2007] URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/intent/07deleuze.html (data obrashcheniya 26.09.12).
Dugin A.G. Postfilosofiya. Tri paradigmy v istorii mysli [Three paradigms in the history of thought]. Moscow, Yevraziyskoe dvizhenie Publ., 2009. 744 p.
Dugin A.G. Filosofiya politiki [Political Philosophy]. Moscow, Arktogeya Publ., 2004. 616 p.
Dugin A.G. Filosofiya traditsionalizma [philosophy of traditionalism]. Moscow, Arktogeya-Tsentr Publ., 2002. 624 p.
Zhizhek S. Dobro pozhalovat v pustynyu Realnogo [Welcome to the Desert of the Real]. Moscow Pragmatika kultury Publ., 2002. 160 p.
Inozemtsev V.L. Vesternizatsiya kak globalizatsiya i "globalizatsiya" kak amerikanizatsiya [Westernization as glo-balization and "globalization" as Americanization] // Voprosy filosofii. 2004. № 4. p. 58-69.
Kostyuk K.N. Arkhaika i modern v rossiyskoy kulture [Archaic and modern in the Russian culture] / Nauka – Internet – Rossiya [b/m, b/g] URL: http://www.nir.ru/sj/sj/sj3-4-99kost.html (data obrashcheniya 26.09.12).
Legengauzen M. Sovremennye voprosy islamskoy mysli [Contemporary Issues of Islamic Thought]. Moscow, Feoriya, DIK Publ., 2009. 210 p.
Makarov N.O. Religiovedcheskoe nasledie Avreliya Avgustina [Religious heritage of St. Augustine] // Religiovedenie. – 2006. № 4. p. 126-138.
MakGrat A. Plyuralizm: vyzov sovremennoy khristianskoy tserkvi [Pluralism : a challenge to modern Christian Church] // Khristianskaya kultura. 2002. № 2. p. 12-23.
Markova L.A. Filosofiya iz khaosa. Zh. Delez i postmodernizm v filosofii, nauke, religii [Philosophy of chaos. Deleuze and postmodernism in philosophy, science, religion]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2004. 384 p.
Razumovskiy D.A. Metamorfozy postmodernistskoy tserkvi v interere "retro-dukhovnosti" [Metamorphosis post-modern church in the interior "retro spirituality"]. Bogoslov.Ru [M., 2007-2012] URL: http://www.bogoslov.ru/text/277615.html (data obrashcheniya 26.09.12).
Fuko M. Theatrum philosophicum [The Logic of Sense] // Delez Zh. Logika smysla; Fuko M. Theatrum philoso-phicum. Moscow, Delovaya kniga Publ., 1998. p. 431-457.
Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya [The Archaeology of Knowledge]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 1996. 308 p.
Evola Yu. Lyudi i ruiny [People and ruins]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2007. p. 5-268.
Altizer T.J.J. Apocalypticism and Modern Thinking // Journal for Christian Theological Research. – 1997. – # 2. – P. 36.
Caputo J.D. After Jacques Derrida Comes the Future / The Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory [Denver, 1999-2012] URL: http://www.jcrt.org/archives/04.2/caputo.shtml (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Caputo J.D. What Do I Love When I Love My God? Deconstruction and Radical Orthodoxy // Questioning God / Ed. Caputo J.D., Dooley M., Scanlon M.J. – Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001. – P. 301-325.
Charlesworth M.J. Philosophy and Religion: From Plato to Postmodernism. – Oxford: Oneworld, 2002. – 312 pp.
Cutsinger J.S. An Open Letter on Tradition // Modern Age. – 1994. – # 36:3. – P. 10-20.
Cutsinger J.S. The Yoga of Hesychasm / Sacred Web: A Journal of Tradition and Modernity [Vancouver, 2012] URL: http://www.sacredweb.com/online_articles/sw10_cutsinger.html (дата обращения 26.09.12).
God, the Gift, and Postmodernism / Ed. Caputo J.D., Scanlon M.J. – Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. – 527 pp.
Hassan I.H. The Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture. – Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987. – 215 pp.
Lakhani M.A. What is Normal? // Sacred Web. – 2006. – Vol. 17. – P. 7-15.
Taylor M.C. Erring: A Postmodern A/theology – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. – 218 pp.
Van Buren P. Theology Now? / Religion-online.org [Claremont, 2012] URL: http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1609 (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Vanhoozer K.J. Theology and the condition of postmodernity: a report on knowledge (of God) // The Cambridge companion to Postmodern Theology / Ed. Vanhoozer K.J. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. – P. 3-25.
Vattimo G. The Age of Interpretation // Rorty R., Vattimo G. The Future of Religion. – NY.: Columbia University Press, 2005. – P. 43-54.
Ward G. Deconstructive theology // The Cambridge companion to Postmodern Theology / Ed. Vanhoozer K.J. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. – P. 76-91.
Wuthnow R. Church Realities and Christian Identity in the 21st Century // The Christian Century. – 1993. – May, 12. – P. 520-572.
СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ / СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗОВАННЫХ ИСТОЧНИКОВ
(ДСТУ ГОСТ 7.1:2006)
Аверьянов, В. В. Сверим понятия (определения от противного). Консерватизм-традиционализм-национализм [Электронный ресурс] // Фонд Питирима Сорокина. – М., 2007. – Режим доступа: http://www.sorokinfond.ru/index.php?id=286. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Анкерсмит, Ф. Р. История и тропология: взлет и падение метафоры. – М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2003. – 496 c.
Антропов, В. В. Этика и религия в "безрелигиозном христианстве" Дитриха Бонхёффера // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7. Философия. – 2005. – № 6. – С. 58–72.
Барт, Р. От произведения к тексту // Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. – М. : Прогресс, 1989. – С. 413–432.
Бачинин, В. А. Постмодернизм и христианство // Общественные науки и современность. – 2007. – № 4. – С. 65–79.
Бурдьё, П. Социология политики. – М. : Socio-Logos, 1993. – 263 c.
Бурдьё, П. Социология социального пространства. – СПб. : Алетейя, 2007. – 288 c.
Ваторопин, А. С. Перспективы секуляризма и религии в эпоху постмодерна / А. С. Ваторопин, К. М. Ольховиков // Общественные науки и современность. – 2002. – № 2. – С. 136–145.
Ваттимо, Д. Насилие – это то, что препятствует задавать вопросы [Электронный ресурс] // Индекс. – М., 1997-2011. – Режим доступа: http://index.org.ru/infospace/398vatt.html. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Генон, Р. Кризис современного мира. – М. : Эксмо, 2008. – 784 с.
Дебор, Г.-Э. Общество спектакля. – М. : Логос, 2000. – 184 с.
Делёз, Ж. Платон и симулякр [Электронный ресурс] // Philosophy.ru. – М., 2007. – Режим доступа: http://philosophy.ru/library/intent/07deleuze.html. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Дугин, А. Г. Постфилософия. Три парадигмы в истории мысли. – М. : Евразийское движение, 2009. – 744 с.
Дугин, А. Г. Философия политики. – М. : Арктогея, 2004. – 616 с.
Дугин, А. Г. Философия традиционализма. – М. : Арктогея-Центр, 2002. – 624 с.
Жижек, С. Добро пожаловать в пустыню Реального. – М. : Прагматика культуры, 2002. – 160 с.
Иноземцев, В. Л. Вестернизация как глобализация и "глобализация" как американизация // Вопросы философии. – 2004. – № 4. – С. 58–69.
Костюк, К. Н. Архаика и модерн в российской культуре [Электронный ресурс] // Наука – Интернет – Россия [б/м, б/г]. – Режим доступа: http://www.nir.ru/sj/sj/sj3-4-99kost.html. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Легенгаузен, М. Современные вопросы исламской мысли. – М. : Феория, ДИК, 2009. – 210 с.
Макаров, Н. О. Религиоведческое наследие Аврелия Августина // Религиоведение. – 2006. – № 4. – С. 126–138.
МакГрат, А. Плюрализм: вызов современной христианской церкви // Христианская культура. – 2002. – № 2. – С. 12–23.
Маркова, Л. А. Философия из хаоса. Ж. Делёз и постмодернизм в философии, науке, религии. – М. : Канон+, 2004. – 384 с.
Разумовский, Д. А. Метаморфозы постмодернистской церкви в интерьере "ретро-духовности" [Электронный ресурс] // Богослов.Ru [М., 2007-2012]. – URL: http://www.bogoslov.ru/text/277615.html. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Фуко, М. Theatrum philosophicum // Делёз Ж. Логика смысла; Фуко М. Theatrum philosophicum. – М. : Раритет, Екатеринбург : Деловая книга, 1998. – С. 431–457.
Фуко, М. Археология знания. – Киев : Ника-Центр, 1996. – 308 c.
Эвола, Ю. Люди и руины // Эвола Ю. Люди и руины. Критика фашизма: взгляд справа. Ориентации. – М. : АСТ, 2007. – С. 5–268.
Altizer, T. J. J. Apocalypticism and Modern Thinking // Journal for Christian Theological Research. – 1997. – № 2. – P. 36.
Caputo, J. D. After Jacques Derrida Comes the Future [Электронный ресурс] // The Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory [Denver, 1999-2012] URL: http://www.jcrt.org/archives/04.2/caputo.shtml. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Caputo, J. D. What Do I Love When I Love My God? Deconstruction and Radical Orthodoxy // Questioning God / Ed. J. D. Caputo, M. Dooley, M. J. Scanlon. – Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 2001. – P. 301–325.
Charlesworth, M. J. Philosophy and Religion: From Plato to Postmodernism. – Oxford : Oneworld, 2002. – 312 pp.
Cutsinger, J. S. An Open Letter on Tradition // Modern Age. – 1994. – № 36:3. – P. 10–20.
Cutsinger, J. S. The Yoga of Hesychasm [Электронный ресурс] // Sacred Web: A Journal of Tradition and Modernity [Vancouver, 2012]. – URL: http://www.sacredweb.com/online_articles/sw10_cutsinger.html. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
God, the Gift, and Postmodernism / Ed. J. D. Caputo, M. J. Scanlon. – Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 1999. – 527 pp.
Hassan, I. H. The Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture. – Columbus : Ohio State University Press, 1987. – 215 pp.
Lakhani, M. A. What is Normal? // Sacred Web. – 2006. – Vol. 17. – P. 7–15.
Taylor, M. C. Erring: A Postmodern A/theology – Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1987. – 218 pp.
Van Buren P. Theology Now? [Электронный ресурс] // Religion-online.org [Claremont, 2012]. – URL: http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1609. – (дата обращения 26.09.12).
Vanhoozer, K. J. Theology and the condition of postmodernity: a report on knowledge (of God) // The Cambridge companion to Postmodern Theology / Ed. K. J. Vanhoozer. – Cambridge : Cam-bridge University Press, 2003. – P. 3–25.
Vattimo, G. The Age of Interpretation // Rorty R., Vattimo G. The Future of Religion. – NY. : Columbia University Press, 2005. – P. 43–54.
Ward, G. Deconstructive theology // The Cambridge companion to Postmodern Theology / Ed. K. J. Vanhoozer. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003. – P. 76–91.
Wuthnow, R. Church Realities and Christian Identity in the 21st Century // The Christian Century. – 1993. – May, 12. – P. 520–572.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
