CIVILIZATIONAL AND HISTORICAL ANTHROPOLOGY ASPECTS OF THE «GREEK MIRACLE»

Spartak Sh. Aytov

Abstract


The purpose of the work is to study the impact of geographical, social and cultural context, mentality characteristics of historical process of society on the origin and characteristics of the development of intellectual achievement, namely philosophy and science. The purpose of the article is to understand natural, historical, cultural, social and psychological aspects that led to the genesis of cognitive development peculiarities of ancient Greek philosophy of scientific knowledge. Methodology. Methodology of the work contains such cognitive approaches as systematic and structural ones, source study and post-positivist concepts, the theory of local civilizations. Theoretical basis and results: the novelty of this work is in studying the diverse factors that determined the emergence and dynamics of ancient Greek philosophical thought and science as a whole system of interrelated elements. The influence on the genesis of philosophy and science of ancient Hellas, its geographical conditions and geopolitical situation  as well as the cultural dialogue with surrounding civilizations, the reception of historical and cultural experience of the previous Hellenic civilization, historical process and  mentality of  ancient Greeks have been analyzed. Conclusions: the whole cluster of the above mentioned factors had a profound and multi-directional influence on the formation and development of Greek philosophy and science. In addition, each of the factors influenced the original intellectual achievements of Greeks. In particular, the influence of natural factors realized in the formation of skills in the mentality of  ancient Greeks has become a prerequisite for philosophizing and scientific knowledge. Geo-political, social and cultural factors have contributed to the geographical expansion of ancient Greeks and their information acquisition about the world. Through the dialogue with other eastern and Mediterranean cultures Greeks mastered intellectually rich and meaningful experience of a number of great civilizations. The precursor forms of intellectual activity have played a significant role in the genesis of ancient Greek philosophy and science. Synergy interaction of these factors has led to rapid development of philosophy and science of ancient Hellas.


Keywords


Ancient Greece; philosophy; science; historical anthropology; civilization

References


Andreev, Yu.V. Tsena garmonii I svobodi/ Yu.V.Andreev [Harmony and freedom price]. Saint Petesburg Publ., Aleyteya. 1999. 500 p.

Bornar,A. Grecheskaya tsivilizatsia/A.Bonnar [Greece civilization].- v 3-x t.-T.1. – Moscow Publ., Iskusstvo.1992. 269 p.

Evdokimov,P.A. Archaicheskya Grecia I Egipet: k probleme kontaktov/P.A. Evdokimov [Archaic Greece and Egypt: to problem of contacts]//Westnik drevney istorii [Ancient history Gerald].2010.issue 2. pp.31-47.

Emelyanov, V.V. Antropologicheskiy povorot v naukah o Drevnem Votoke/ V.V.Emelyanov [Anthropological turn in sciences of Ancient Ist]//Voprosi philosophii [Problems of philosophy]. 2013. issue 2. pp. 136-148.

Zaytsev,A.I. Kulturniy perevorot v drevney Grecii v VII-VI vv do n.e./ A.I. Zaytsev [Cultural turn in ancient Greece in VII-VI BC] Moscow. Nauka Publ., 1985. 322 p.

Kembrigskaya istoria drevnego mira/pod. red. J.Bordmena and J.Hemmonda/[Cembrige history of ancient world in redaction of J.Bordmen and J.Hemmond]. tom III. Chast.3 [volume 3,part 3]. Moscow. Ladomir Publ., 2007. 862 p.

Markish, S.M. «Ostavili po sebe bessmartnuyu pamyat»/ S.M. Markish [«They stayed immortal memo-ry»]//Chelovec [The man]. 1996. issue 5. pp. 133-150.

СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ / СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗОВАННЫХ ИСТОЧНИКОВ
(ДСТУ ГОСТ 7.1:2006)

Андреев, Ю. В. Цена свободы и гармонии [Текст] / Ю. В. Андреев. – СПб.: Алейтейя, 1999. –400с.

Боннар, А. Греческая цивилизация [Текст] / А. Боннар,– в 3-х т. – т. – М.: Искусство, 1992. – 269 с.

Евдокимов, П. А. Архаическая Элида и Египет: к проблеме контактов [Текст] / П. А. Евдокимов // Вестник древней истории. – 2010. –№ 2. – С. 31–47.

Емельянов, В. В. Антропологический поворот в науке о Древнем Востоке (на примере ассиро-логии) [Текст] / В. В. Емельянов// Вопросы фи-лософии. – 2013. – № 2. – С. 136–148.

Зайцев, А. И. Культурный переворот в древней Греции в VII-VI вв. до н.э. [Текст]/ А. И. Зайцев. – М., 1985. – 322 с.

Кембриджская история древнего мира [Текст] / под ред. Дж. Бордмэна и Дж.-Л. Хэммонда.- том III. – ч. 3. – М.: Ладомир. 2007. – 862 с.

Маркиш, С. М. «Оставили по себе бессмертную память» [Текст] / С. М. Маркиш // Человек. – 1996. – № 5. – С. 133–150.

Поплинский, Ю. К. Из истории этнокультурных контактов Африки и Эгейского мира [Текст] / Ю. К. Поплинский. – М.: Наука, 1978. – 207 с.

Прокопенко, В. В. Неоколониальная идеология и история античной философии [Текст] / В. В. Прокопенко // Віснік ХНУ ім. В. Н. Кара-зіна. Серія: Філософія. Філософські перипетії. – 2012. – № 1012. – С. 5–12.

Реале, Дж. Западная философия от истоков до наших дней [Текст] / Дж. Реале, Д. Антисери. – в 4-х кн.- кн.1. – СПб.: Петрополис, 1997. – 320 с.

Степин, В. С. Специфика научного познания и социокультурные предпосылки его генезиса [Текст] / В. С. Степин / Наука и культура. – М.: Наука, 1984. – С. 138-158.

Senn, S. Socratic philosophy rationalism and «divine»: decision making without Divine intervention // http://gramata.Univ-Paris 1 fr/Plato/. 2013. March.

Sneed, S. H. A genesis of thinking in the evolution of Ancient philosophy and modern software devel-opment// http://Link.Springer.com/chapter.2011.

Yang, M-H. How arifmetic is useful for under-standing the good as the principle of forms in Plato «Republic» // http:// gramata.Univ-Paris 1 fr/Plato/. 2011. April


GOST Style Citations






DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2013/19773

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.