DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i15.169482

GENDER PARTNERSHIP AND TOLERANCE PHENOMENON

R. I. Kuzmenko

Abstract


Purpose. The article analyzes the role of such a phenomenon as tolerance in a partnership between a man and a woman, emphasizing its importance and necessity in their relations. The purpose of the study is to estimate the role of the tolerance phenomenon in the process of gender partnership. Theoretical basis. The works of domestic and foreign scientists contributed to estimate the function of tolerance during communication, cooperation and co-creation. In this paper the methodology of E. Fromm and N. Khamitov’s metaanthropology is used. Originality. It was proved that the success of a gender partnership depends on how tolerant its participants are to each other. Besides this, it has been established that tolerance is the main criterion for gender partnership. The idea of tolerance is considered as the way to fruitful development of human relations. For the first time it has been determined that gender partnership can be manifested on the ordinary, frontier and metafrontier levels of human existence. Tolerance has its own specifics and a manifestation on each of them. Conclusions. Metaanthropology has helped to estimate the role of tolerance among men and women in the partnership process. So, it can be stated that tolerance is a basis for gender partnership that harmonizes the relationship among a man and a woman and makes them egalitarian. Only on the metafrontier level of human being tolerance can be manifestation of individual integrity. Sincere, open interaction and creative work with Other are formed on this foundation. Thus, gender partnership with inexhaustible, complementary potential is the vector of development of human relations.


Keywords


gender partnership; tolerance; united actions; communication; cooperation; co-creation; human relations

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Aheieva, V. P., Kobelianska, L. S., & Skoryk, M. M. (Eds.). (2004). Osnovy teorii genderu: Navchalnyi posibibnyk. Kyiv: К.І.S. (in Ukrainian)

Beauvoir, S. de. (1997). Le deuxième sexe. (Vol. 1-2). S. G. Ayvazova (Ed.), Trans. from French; M. V. Aristova. Мoscow: Progress; St. Petersburg:Aleteyya. (in Russian)

Berdyaеv, N. (1989). Eros i lichnost. Filosofiya pola i lyubvi. Moscow: Prometey. (in Russian)

Diamond, L. M. (2015). Sexual fluidity:The international encyclopedia of human sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs452 9 (in English)

ERA Progress Report 2018. Data gathering and information for the 2018 ERA monitoring-Technical Report. (2019). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/era/era_progress_report_2018-technical.pdf (in English)

Fromm, E., & Dobrenkov, V. (Ed.). (1990). To have or to be? (2 Edit.). Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)

Hrynevych, L. (2016). Instytualizatsiia hendernoi osvity: Perspektyvy ta ryzyky. Gender Culture Centre. Retrieved from https://www.genderculturecentre.org/institucionalizaciya-gendernoi-osvit/ (in Ukrainian)

Khamitov, N. (2017). Etika: Put k krasote otnosheniy. Kyiv: KNT. (in Russian)

Khamitov, N., Krylova, S., Rozova, T., Mineva, S., & Lyutyy, T. (2014). Filosofskaya antropologiya: Slovar. Kyiv: KNT.(in Russian)

Kirilina, A. (2000). O primenenii ponyatya gender v russkoyazychnom lingvisticheskom opisanii. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 3, 18-19. (in Russian)

Krylova, S. (2011). Krasa liudyny: Osobystist, simia, suspilstvo (soscialno-filosofskyi analiz): Monohrafiia. Nizhin: Aspekt-Polihraf.(in Ukrainian)

Marinelli, N., Mazzoli, C., & Palmucci, F. (2017). How does gender really affect investment behavior? Economics Letters, 151, 58-61.doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.006 (in English)

Mounier, E. (1992). Personalizm.Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)

Murgia, A., & Poggio, B. (2018). Gender and precarious research careers. A comparative analysis. London:Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315201245 256 (in English)

Pleșu, A. (2013). Tolerance and the Intolerable. Crisis of Concept. BalticWorlds, 3-4, 10-14. (in English)

Saukh, P. (2001). Ukraina na mezhi tysiacholit: Transformatsiia dukhu i vyprobuvannia natsionalnym buttiam. Rivne: Volynski Oberehy. (in Ukrainian)

The Global Gender Gap Report 2016. (2017). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR16/WEF_Global_Gender_Gap_Report_2016.pdf (in English)

Walzer, M., & Abramov, M. (Ed.). (2000). On toleration. I. Myurnberg, Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektualnoy knigi.(in Russian)


GOST Style Citations


Основи теорії гендеру : навч. посіб. / ред. В. П. Агеєва, Л. С. Кобелянська, М. М. Скорик. – Київ : К.І.С., 2004. – 536 с.

Бовуар, C. де. Второй пол / С. де Бовуар ; пер. с франц. ; общ. ред. и вступ. ст. С. Г. Айвазовой ; комм. М. Аристовой. – Москва : Прогресс ; Санкт-Петербург : Алетейя, 1997. – Т. 1, Т. 2. – 832 с.

Бердяев, Н. Эрос и личность. Философия пола и любви / Н. Бердяев. – Москва : Прометей, 1989. – 159 с.

Diamond, L. M. Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire / L. M. Diamond. – Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 2015. – 333 p. doi: 10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs452 9

ERA Progress Report 2018. Data gathering and information for the 2018 ERA monitoring-Technical Report. – 2019. – 130 p. – Access Mode: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/era/era_progress_report_2018-technical.pdf (Date of Access: 04.05.2019). – Title from Screen.

Фромм, Е. Мати чи бути? / E. Фромм ; пер. c англ. ; общ. ред. и посл. В. И. Добреньков. – 2-е изд. – Москва : Прогресс, 1990. – 336 с.

Гриневич, Л. Інституалізація гендерної освіти: перспективи та ризики [Електронний ресурс] / Л. Гриневич // Центр гендерної культури. – 2016. – 5 грудня. – Access Mode: https://www.genderculturecentre.org/institucionalizaciya-gendernoi-osvit/ – Title from Screen. – Date of Access: 04.05.2019.

Хамитов, Н. Этика: путь к красоте отношений / Н. Хамитов, С. Крылова. – Киев : КНТ, 2017. – 264 с.

Философская антропология : словарь / Н. Хамитов, С. Крылова, Т. Розова, С. Минева, Т. Лютый. – Киев : КНТ, 2014. – 233 с.

Кирилина, А. В. О применении понятия гендер в русскоязычном лингвистическом описании / А. В. Кирилина // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. – 2000. – № 3. – С. 18–19.

Крилова, С. Краса людини: особистість, сім’я, суспільство (соціально-філософський аналіз) : [монографія] / С. Крилова. – Ніжин : Аспект-Поліграф, 2011. – 344 с.

Marinelli, N. How Does Gender Really Affect Investment Behavior? / N. Marinelli, C. Mazzoli, F. Palmucci // Economics Letters. – 2017. – Vol. 151. – P. 58–61. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.006

Муньє, Е. Персонализм / E. Муньє. – Москва : Искусство, 1992. – 144 с.

Murgia, A. Gender and Precarious Research Careers. A comparative analysis / A. Murgia, B. Poggio. – London : Routledge, 2018. – 256 p. doi: 10.4324/9781315201245 256

Pleșu, A. Tolerance and the Intolerable. Crisis of Concept / A. Pleșu // Baltic worlds. – 2013. – Vol. 3-4. – P. 10–14.

Саух, П. Ю. Україна на межі тисячоліть: трансформація духу і випробування національним буттям / П. Ю. Саух. – Рівне : Волинські обереги, 2001. – 179 с.

The Global Gender Gap Report 2016 // World Economic Forum. – 2017. – 382 p. – Access Mode: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR16/WEF_Global_Gender_Gap_Report_2016.pdf (Date of Access: 04.05.2019). – Title from Screen.

Уолцер, М. О терпимости / М. Уолцер ; пер. с англ. И. Мюрнберг ; общ. науч. ред. М. А. Абрамов. – Москва : Идея-Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги, 2000. – 160 с.





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.