gender, gender strategies, gender partnership, gender anthropology, androgyny-analysis, androgynism, existential gender, strategy of existential androgynism, political leadership


Purpose. The purpose of the article is to understand the issue of gender strategies of political leadership. Theoretical basis. The works of Ukrainian and foreign scholars helped to find out the specifics of male and female leadership. The article applied the latest methodology of androgyny-analysis. According to this methodology, sex has not only a biological, psychological and social, but also an existential dimension. So, the existential dimension of gender is soulfulness as an existential femininity and spirituality as an existential masculinity. These two beginnings may conflict and may be in harmony. Depending on this, we have constructive or destructive strategies for the development of both the personality and the relations between individuals. Constructiveness here means not only gender equality, but also gender partnership. Originality. In the context of modern gender anthropology and androgyny-analysis, it is found that as a result of the implementation of the strategy of existential sexism and existential hermaphroditism, political leadership becomes authoritarian, and sometimes also totalitarian, while the strategy of androgynism associated with gender partnership gives rise to constructive political leadership. Conclusions. Androgynous personality of a political leader, which balances the existential and psychological qualities of men and women, is able to reform the society and change the country for better.

Author Biographies

N. V. Khamitov, H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy NAS of Ukraine

H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine), e-mail

D. D. Dandekar, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University

National Pedagogical Dragomanov University (Kyiv, Ukraine), e-mail


Androgyny. (2002). In T. Dublikash et al., & O. N. Pishchulina, Feminologiya: Slovar terminov (pp. 26-27). Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian)

Fromm, E. (2004). The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. E. M. Telyatnikov, T. V. Panfilov, Trans. from Engl. Мoscow: AST. (in Russian)

Gipson, A., Pfaff, D., Mendelsohn, D., Catenacci, L., & Burke, W. (2017). Women and leadership: Selection, development, leadership style, and performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(1), 32-65. doi: (in English)

Khamitov, N. (2000). Filosofiia stati: Proiasnennia predmeta. Philosophical Thought, 6, 45-55. (in Ukrainian)

Khamitov, N. (2002). Androhinizm. In V. I. Shynkaruk et al. (Eds.), Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk (p. 23). Kyiv: Abrys. (in Ukrainian)

Khamitov, N. (2004). Ekzystentsiinyi vymir stati. In V. H. Tabachkovskyi (Ed.), Liudyna v esentsiinykh ta ekzystentsiinykh vymirakh (pp. 223-244). Кyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)

Khamitov, N. (2017). Filosofska antropolohiia: Aktualni problemy. Vid teoretychnoho do praktychnoho povorotu (2 Edit). Kyiv: KNT. (in Ukrainian)

Khamitov, N., & Krylova, S. (2018). Androhin-analiz. In N. Khamitov, & S. Krylova, Filosofskyi slovnyk: Liudyna i svit (2 Edit., pp. 8-10). Kyiv: KNT. (in Ukrainian)

Krylova, S. (2011). Beauty of the human being: Personality. Family. Society (socio-philosophical analysis): Monohrafiya. Nizhyn: Aspekt-Polihraf. (in Ukrainian)

Mineva, S. (2018). The views of Aristotle on the political and on happiness, the modern reading of the relationship of ethics and politics, and the contemporary realities. The Challenge: Aristotle: Conference, 322-346. Sofia: University "St. Clement Ohridski". (in English)

Murgia, A., & Poggio, B. (Eds.). (2018). Gender and Precarious Research Careers: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge. (in English)

Plato. (1993). Pir. In Sobranie Sochineniy in 4 vol. (Vol. 2, pp. 98-100). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)

Scheler, M. (1994). Chelovek v epokhu uravnivaniya. In L. A. Chukhina, A. V. Denezhkin (Ed.), A. N. Malinkin, & A. F. Fillipov, Trans. from German. Izbrannye proizvedeniya (p. 114). Moscow: Gnozis. (in Russian)

Shynkaruk, V. (1994). Vira, nadiia, liubov. Viche, 4, 145-150. (in Ukrainian)




How to Cite

Khamitov, N. V., & Dandekar, D. D. (2019). GENDER STRATEGIES AND POLITICAL LEADERSHIP. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (15), 40–48.