CONTRACTUALISTIC MEASUREMENTS OF THE GENDER: POSSIBILITIES AND BORDERS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i15.169074

Keywords:

gender, gender justice, social contract, identity, recognition, transcendental contractualism

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is critical reconstruction of gender issues within the framework of modern political philosophy and political anthropology, in-depth reflection of the phenomena of justice, identity, human dignity in the aspect of their gender measurements and the search for the answer to the fundamental question for leading gender discourses: is freedom and justice, in fact, possible only together with stresses, a feeling of one’s sense-rooted belonging to one or another community? Theoretical basis. The supplement of the phenomenological and transcendental methodology by the method of contractualism directs the study of the topic specified in the article’s title into a new direction, and reflects its essential measurements and aspects. Understanding gender as an important philosophical and anthropological problem and a complex "social construct" precisely within the framework of the latest critical and self-critical versions of the theory of social contract reveal fruitful perspectives for political philosophy and anthropology. Originality. The study of the phenomena of "recognition" (A. Honneth) of "gender justice" (N. Fraser), "moral sense" (E. Tugendhat) outlines the possibilities and sense of filling the principle of social contract with a specific theoretical and practical content, substantiates the need to expand the philosophical and anthropological interpretation space of gender issues. Conclusions. Significance of the gender community for the sociocultural and existential identity of the individual enables (through organic, life-world belonging to a certain tradition and culture) his/her security and the ability to adequately orient in difficult life situations. However, the main purpose of human life is the ability to self-identity, even after profound changes in the structure of personality that arise in difficult situations of contempt and injustice.

Author Biography

D. V. Usov, Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine
(Cherkasy, Ukraine), e-mail dimausov@i.ua

References

Danylova, T. (2015). The Way to the Self: The Novel "Steppenwolf" Through the Lens of Jungian Process of Individuation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 7, 28-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/43391 (in English)

Fraser, N. (2003). Ausgebeutete Klassen, verachtete Formen der Sexualität und zweidimensionale Kategorien. In A. Honneth, & N. Fraser, & B. Wolf, Trans., Umverteilung oder Anerkennung?: Eine politisch-philosophische Kontroverse (pp. 27-35). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (in German)

Fraser, N. (2003). Soziale Gerechtigkeit im Zeitalter der Identitätpolitik. Umverteilung, Anerkennung und Beteiligung. In A. Honneth, & N. Fraser, & B. Wolf, Trans., Umverteilung oder Anerkennung?: Eine politisch-philosophische Kontroverse (pp. 13-129). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (in German)

Habermas, J., & Poliarush, B. (Ed.). (2006). Zaluchennia inshoho: Studii z politychnoi teorii. A. Dahnii, Trans. from German. Lviv: Astroliabiia. (in Ukrainian)

Honneth, A. (1992). Kampf um Anerkennung: Zur moralischer Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (in German)

Honneth, A. (2000). Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit: Aufsätze zur praktischen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (in German)

Honneth, A., & Fraser, N. (2003). Umverteilung oder Anerkennung?: Eine politisch-philosophische Kontroverse. B. Wolf, Trans. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (in German)

Horn, C. (2003). Einführung in die politische philosophie. D. Schönecker, & N. Strobach (Eds.). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (in German)

Korkh, O., & Khmil, V. (2014). Transcendental aspects of gender. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 5, 69-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2014/25045 (in Ukrainian)

Koslowski, P. (1996). Postmoderna kultura: Sotsialno-kulturni naslidky tekhnichnoho rozvytku. In V. V. Liakh, & V. S. Pazenok, Suchasna zarubizhna filosofiia. Techii i napriamy: Khrestomatiia (pp. 214-294). Kyiv: Vakler. (in Ukrainian)

Sytnichenko, L. (2018). Identity, recognition and justice in modern political anthropology. Multiversu. Philosophical Almanac, 3-4, 3-18. (in Ukrainian)

Tugendhat, E. (2006). Das Problem einer autonomen Moral. In N. Scarano, & M. Suárez (Eds.), Ernst Tugendhats Ethik: Einwaende und Erwiderungen (pp. 13-31). München: C. H. Beck. (in German)

Tugendhat, E. (2008). Spir pro prava liudyny. In S. Gosepat, & G. Lomanna (Eds.), Trans. from German, Philosophie der Menschenrechte (pp. 48-59). Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. (in Ukrainian)

Downloads

Published

2019-05-29

How to Cite

Usov, D. V. (2019). CONTRACTUALISTIC MEASUREMENTS OF THE GENDER: POSSIBILITIES AND BORDERS. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (15), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i15.169074

Issue

Section

SOCIAL ASPECT OF HUMAN BEING