gender, gender inequality, human rights, economic development, physical and mental health, global society


Purpose. The purpose of the study is to define the negative impact of gender inequality on the global economy and public health. Theoretical basis. Unequal treatment of individuals based on gender discrimination has led to negative consequences in various areas of society. Gender inequality is very costly for the world due to the lack of representation of women in the labor market, gender income inequality situation, glass ceiling effect that have the negative impact on the world economy. Outdated gender roles, which are inconsistent with the new reality and the idea of human progress, have a significant impact on life expectancy, health, mortality and disease, access to health care and medical care. Originality. The vector of the development of the human society changes its direction, which leads to a renewal of an individual status-role framework, the creation of the new systems of values, theories and ideologies that require a new field of opportunities and free human self-identification and gender-identification. Conclusions. The results show that gender inequality has a negative impact on economic growth and development, as well as on physical and mental health. Strictly fixed gender roles limit free human development. Everyone should have the right to determine her/his gender, her/his interests and behavior patterns, while having the right to personal respect and respect for their honor, convictions, and gender practices.

Author Biographies

T. V. Danylova, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine), e-mail danilova_tv@ukr.net

L. A. Kats, University of Haifa

University of Haifa (Haifa, Israel), e-mail udmilakac9@gmail.com


Beauvoir, S. de. (2011). The Second Sex. C. Borde, S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans. New York: Vintage Books. (in English)

Borrell, C., Palència, L., Muntaner, C., Urquía, M., Malmusi, D., & O’Campo, P. (2014). Influence of macrosocial policies on women’s health and gender inequalities in health. Epidemiological Reviews, 36, 31-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxt002 (in English)

Constitution of Ukraine. (1996). Fifth sessionof the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/constitution-of-ukraine/168071f58b (in English)

Danylova, T. V. (2017). Eastern mysticism and Timothy Leary: Human beyond the conventional reality. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 11, 135-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105498 (in English)

DeFrancisco, V. P., Palczewski, C. H., & McGeough, D. (2013). Gender in communication: A critical introduction. USA: SAGE Publications. (in English)

Diamond, M. (2002). Sex and gender are different: Sexual identity and gender identity are different. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7(3), 320-334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104502007003002 (in English)

Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (in English)

Eckersley, R. (2015). Beyond inequality: Acknowledging the complexity of social determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 121-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.052 (in English)

Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719 (in English)

Emslie, C., Ridge, D., Ziebland, S., & Hunt, K. (2006). Men’s accounts of depression: Reconstructing or resisting hegemonic masculinity. Social Science & Medicine, 62(9), 2246-2257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.017 (in English)

Evans, J., Frank, B., Oliffe, J., & Gregory, D. (2011). Health, illness, men and masculinities (HIMM): A theoretical framework for understanding men and their health. Journal of Men’s Health, 8(1), 7-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jomh.2010.09.227 (in English)

Friedan, B., Fermaglich, K., & Fine, L. (2013). The Feminine Mystique. USA: W. W. Norton & Company. (in English)

Georgieva, K., & Bibeau, M.-C. (2018). This is the global price of gender inequality. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06/the-high-price-of-gender-inequality (in English)

Khmil, V. V., & Korkh, O. M. (2017). Conditions of historicity of human existence and history humanity according to Jaspers. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 12, 121-127. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119143 (in Ukrainian)

Kira, I., Ashby, J., Lewandowski, L., Smith, I., & Odenat, L. (2012). Gender inequality and its effects in female torture survivors. Psychology, 3(4), 352-363. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.34050 (in English)

Klasen, S., & Lamanna, F. (2009). The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: New evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist Economics, 15(3), 91-132. (in English)

Kolesnykova, T. (2017). "I light my candle from yours…": Anthropological aspects of modern library services for scientists. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 11, 49-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105478 (in English)

Little, W., Vyain, S., Scaramuzzo, G., Cody-Rydzewski, S., Griffiths, H., Strayer, E., & McGivern, R. (2013). Introduction to Sociology. USA: OpenStax College. (in English)

Mitra, A., Bang, J., & Biswas, A. (2015). Gender equality and economic growth: Is it equality of opportunity or equality of outcomes? Feminist Economics, 21(1), 110-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.930163 (in English)

OHagan, J. (2018). The astronomical cost of gender inequality. Euronews. Retrieved from https://www.euronews.com/2018/06/05/the-astronomical-cost-of-gender-inequality (in English)

Petersen, M. J. (2016). The OIC, human rights, and religion: Rejection, reconciliation, or reconceptualization. In A. T. Chase (Ed.), Routledge Handbook on Human Rights and the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 304-316). Great Britain: Routledge International Handbooks. (in English)

Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). Fifty key concepts in gender studies. USA: SAGE Publications. (in English)

Sartre, J.-P. (1946). Existentialism Is Humanism. Lecture given. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/exist/sartre.htm (in English)

Storozhuk, S. V., & Hoyan, I. M. (2017). Gender equality as a modern phenomenon. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 11, 71-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105481 (in English)

The Declaration of Independence. (1776). In Congress. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America. Retrieved from http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/ (in English)

The Impact of Gender Inequality on Health. (undated). EuroHealthNet. Retrieved from https://eurohealthnet.eu/media/news-releases/impact-gender-inequality-health (in English)

Understanding Gender. (2018). Gender Spectrum. Retrieved from https://www.genderspectrum.org/quick-links/understanding-gender/ (in English)

Watson, E. (2014). Gender equality is your issue too. UN Women. Retrieved from http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2014/9/emma-watson-gender-equality-is-your-issue-too (in English)

What are the consequences of gender inequality. (2018). Faith, gender & sexuality: A toolkit. Retrieved from http://spl.ids.ac.uk/sexuality-gender-faith/women-gender-power/what-are-consequences-gender-inequality (in English)

Wiley, S. (2016). The cost of gender inequality. Chicago policy review. Retrieved from http://chicagopolicyreview.org/2016/08/19/the-cost-of-gender-inequality-2/ (in English)

Yu, S. (2018). Uncovering the hidden impacts of inequality on mental health: A global study. Translational Psychiatry, 8(98), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0148-0 (in English)




How to Cite

Danylova, T. V., & Kats, L. A. (2019). "ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS": THE NEGTIVE IMPACT OF GENDER INEQUALITY ON THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND PUBLIC HEALTH. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (15), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i15.168842