PHILOSOPHICAL AND SOCIOCULTURAL DIMENSIONS OF PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGICAL SECURITY
Keywords:security, social security, subjective security, psychological security, educational security, philosophical and sociocultural dimensions of securities
Purpose. The dynamics and pace of social and economic transformations that are characteristic of modern society, lead to an increase in tension and the destruction of habitual stereotypes – ideals, values, norms, patterns of behaviour that unite people. These moments encourage us to rethink the understanding of "security" essence, in particular, psychological, which emphasizes the urgency of its study in the philosophical and sociocultural coordinates. Theoretical basis of the research is based on the philosophical methodology of K. Jaspers, E. Fromm and the A. Maslow’s psychological approach to understanding of a person. Originality. Psychological security is considered at different levels: first and foremost, society is a characteristic of social security, that is an analysis of how today’s social technologies, social changes affect the quality of life of the country’s population; secondly, the social environment – the family, the immediate environment, reference groups, training teams; thirdly, a person is an experience of his own security-insecurity, when it is possible to talk about the manifestations of psychological violence, when certain behavioral acts contribute to the violation of the security of the other or to self-destruction. It is found out that the knowledge of psychological security is closely connected with the socio-historical conditions of being, with the level of development of material and spiritual culture, with the interests and values prevailing in society, which determines its ontological, epistemological and axiological features. The presented issue is considered in the correlation of psychological security with types of scientific rationality – classical, nonclassical and post-nonclassical approaches, within the framework of which various perspectives, aspects, forms and types of psychological security are studied. Conclusions. The concept of security requires a systematic description of its manifestations, types, levels, concepts: security as the absence of dangers (based on the principle of dichotomy, that is, a certain whole consisting of two opposite parts, in this case, the whole is human existence); security as a certain activity to ensure or to prevent any threats or dangers (activity approach); security as a conscious necessity, the value of the individual. The study systematizes various ideas about psychological security in accordance with the logic of scientific knowledge: in the mainstream of classical, non-classical and post-nonclassical approaches.
Baeva, I., & Bordovskaia, N. (2015). The psychological safety of the educational environment and the psychological well-being of Russian secondary school pupils and teachers. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8(1), 86-99. (in English)
Belevsky, O. A. (2014). National security as subject of the socio-philosophical analysis. Philosophy and Political Science in the Context of Modern Culture, 7, 182-186. (in Ukrainian)
Chen, J., May, D., Schwoerer, C., & Augelli, B. (2018). Exploring the boundaries of career calling: The moderating roles of procedural justice and psychological Safety. Journal of Career Development, 45(2), 103-116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316671214 (in English)
Edmondson, A., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305 (in English)
Fesenko, G. G. (2015). Urban anthropological discourse of safety philosophy. Hileya: Naukovyy Visnyk, 92(2), 166-170. (in Ukrainian)
Galazhinsky, E., & Klochko, V. (2012). System anthropological psychology: methodological foundations. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 5, 81-98. (in English)
Gerlach, R., & Gockel, C. (2018). We belong together: belonging to the principal’s in-group protects teachers from the negative effects of task conflict on psychological safety. School Leadership & Management, 38(3), 302-322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1407307 (in English)
Kalashnikova, L. V. (2016). Socio-philosophical preconditions of formation of the concept of security in protosociology. Granі, 9(137), 6-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.15421/171672 (in Ukrainian)
Korytova, G., & Zakotnova, Y. (2015). Psikhologicheskaya bezopastnost i zashchishchennost obrazovatelnoy sredy: faktory riski i usloviya. Bulletin Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 9(162), 96-102. (in Russian)
Kruzhkov, A. P. (2017). Osnovnye metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya bezopasnosti v sotsialnoy filosofii. Pozharnaya Bezopasnost: Problemy i Perspektivy, 1(8), 359-362. (in Russian)
Kulikova, T., & Maliy, D. (2017). Professional and personal qualities of the teacher in the context of the psychological safety of educational environment. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(4), 715-722. doi: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.4.715 (in English)
Kulikova, T., Shalaginova, K., & Cherkasova, S. (2017). The polyethnic competence of class teacher as a resource for ensuring the psychological security of pupils in a polycultural educational environment. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3), 557-564. doi: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.3.557 (in English)
Lee, H., Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2018). Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 187-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.005 (in English)
Melnyk, V. V. (2017). Fear phenomenon in existential philosophy. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 11, 41-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105476 (in English)
Savchenko, I. A. (2016). Social safety of the teacher in the educational environment: Conceptual bases. Modern scientific research and innovations. Retrieved from http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2016/03/65083 (in Russian)
Singh, B., Shaffer, M., & Selvarajan, T. (2018). Antecedents of organizational and community embeddedness: The roles of support, psychological safety, and need to belong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 339-354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2223 (in English)
Zinchenko, Y. P. (2011). Metodologicheskie osnovy psikhologii bezopasnosti. National Psychological Journal, 2(6), 11-14. (in Russian)
Zaichenko, A. A., & Eksakusto, T. V. (2014). Personality traits in individuals with different profiles of subjective life quality. Social Psychology and Society, 5(2), 100-114. (in English)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).