DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150513

EUROPEAN PLASTIC ART IN ANTHROPOLOGICAL DIMENSION: FROM THE CLASSICS TO THE POSTMODERNISM

R. M. Rusin, I. V. Liashenko

Abstract


Purpose. The article is devoted to the analysis of corporality as an attribute of plastic art in the Ancient art, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the modernism and the postmodernism. Theoretical basis. The authors consider historical development of the art as a change of paradigms. Within each paradigm a special understanding of art is created, which is characterized both by the act of creativity itself and by the evaluation of its results. Particularly urgent is the task to identify the origins of these changes, to indicate their stages, the direction of the evolution of artistic creativity. In this context, corporality as a paradigm of European plastic art is considered in the article in the concrete historical dimension from the classics to the postmodernism. Originality. Postmodern experiments stimulate blurring the borders between the traditional forms and genres of art. Review of canonical ideas about the creation and destruction, order and chaos in art illustrates conscious reorientation from the classical understanding of artistic creativity to the construction of artifacts-simulacra, which is a characteristic feature in the oeuvre of contemporary artists, ranging from the pop art to the present day. Conclusions. The ideas of postmodern philosophers found their visual embodiment in modern artistic practices. Reconstruction of the body, re-switching of its elements according to the principle of chaotic collage, the interpretation of the human body as a separate substance isolated from the individual him/herself, which is presented as a phenomenon of mass culture, became the basis of the creative method of contemporary plastic art. The ideas of postmodern philosophers have found their visual embodiment in the contemporary artistic practices.


Keywords


corporality; man; sculpture; classical art; modernism; postmodernism; artistic image

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aliaiev, G., & Kutsepal, S. (2018). Nikolay Lossky’s Cosmology. Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, 154-162. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/15 (in English)

Bazaluk, O. (2015). Postmodernism: Philosophy of Education. Future Human Image, 2(5), 9-22. (in Ukrainian)

Damascus, J. (1913). Polnoe sobranie tvoreniy Sv. John Damascus. St. Petersburg: Imperatorskaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya Dukhovnaya Akademiya. (in Russian)

Khmil, V., & Malivkyi, A. (2017). Contemporary reception of Rene Descartes’ skepticism. Philosophy and Cosmology, 19, 168-178. (in Ukrainian)

Khmil, V., & Malivkyi, A. (2018). The problem of forms of completing the Copernicus revolution in modern Cartesian science. Philosophy and Cosmology, 21, 131-139. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/21/14 (in English)

Liashenko, I. (2018). Wilhelm Dilthey: Understanding the human world. Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, 163-169. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/16 (in English)

Losev, A. F. (1979). Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Ranniy ellinizm. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)

Okorokov, V. (2018). Limits of thought in the light of nature and Divinity. A return to ancient thought or the quest for the being of primordial thinking in the later Heidegger. Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, 170-184. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/17 (in English)

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1991). La deshumanización del arte. I. Terteryan, & N. Matyash (Compilers), Trans. from Spanish. Moscow: Raduga. (in Russian)

Pryhodko, V., & Rudenko, S. (2018). Body and space relationship in the research field of phenomenological anthropology: Blumenberg’s criticism of Edmund Husserl’s "Anthropology Phobia". Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 13, 30-40. doi: 10.15802/ampr.v0i13.125512 (in English)

Pstuszek, A. (2018). The social potential of the polish art in the transformation period. Future Human Image, 9, 82-91. doi: 10.29202/fhi/9/8 (in English)

Rudenko, S., Sobolievskyi, Y., & Tytarenko, V. (2018). Cosmology in the philosophical education of Ukraine: History and modern condition. Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, 128-138. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/12 (in English)

Schopenhauer, A. (1999). Sobranie sochineniy. Die welt als wille und vorstellung (Vol. 1-6). Y. Aykhenvald, Trans. Moscow: TERRA – Knizhnyy Club; Respublika. (in Russian)

Tsarenok, A. (2017). The cosmological potential of byzantine ascetic aesthetics. Future Human Image, 8, 160-170. (in English)

Volynskiy, A. L. (1992). Kniga likovaniy: Azbuka klassicheskogo tantsa. Moscow: Artist. Rezhisser. Teatr. (in Russian)


GOST Style Citations


Aliaiev, G. Nikolay Lossky’s Cosmology / G. Aliaiev, S. Kutsepal // Philosophy and Cosmology. 2018. – Vol. 20. – P. 154–162. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/15

Базалук, О. О. Постмодернізм: філософія освіти / О. О. Базалук // Future Human Image. – 2015. – № 2 (5). – P. 9–22.

Дамаскин, И. Полное собрание творений Св. Иоанна Дамаскина / И. Дамаскин ; пер. с греч. – Санкт-Петербург : Имп. С.-Петерб. Духовная Акад., 1913. – Т. 1. – 442 с.

Хміль, В. В. Сучасна рецепція скептицизму Рене Декарта / В. В. Хміль, А. М. Малівський // Philosophy and Cosmology. – 2017. – Vol. 19. – P. 168–178.

Khmil, V. The Problem of Forms of Completing the Copernicus Revolution in Modern Cartesian Science / V. Khmil, A. Malivkyi // Philosophy and Cosmology. – 2018. – Vol. 21. – P. 131–139. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/21/14

Liashenko, I. Wilhelm Dilthey: Understanding the Human World / I. Liashenko // Philosophy and Cosmology. – 2018. – Vol. 20. – 163–169. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/16

Лосев, А. Ф. История античной эстетики. Ранний эллинизм / А. Ф. Лосев. – Москва : Искусство, 1979. – 815 с.

Okorokov, V. Limits of Thought in the Light of Nature and Divinity. A Return to Ancient Thought or the Quest for the Being of Primordial Thinking in the Later Heidegger / V. Okorokov // Philosophy and Cosmology. – 2018. – Vol. 20. – P. 170–184. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/17

Хосе Ортега-и-Гассет. Дегуманизация искусства / Хосе Ортега-и-Гассет ; сост. И. Тертерян, Н. Матяш ; пер. с испан. – Москва : Радуга, 1991. – 639 с. – (Серия: Антология литературно-эстетической мысли).

Pryhodko, V. Body and Space Relationship in the Research field of Phenomenological Anthropology: Blumenberg’s Criticism of Edmund Husserl’s "Anthropology Phobia" / V. Pryhodko, S. Rudenko // Антропологічні виміри філософських досліджень. – 2018. – Вип. 13. – С. 30 –40. doi: 10.15802/ampr.v0i13.125512

Pstuszek, A. The Social Potential of the Polish Art in the Transformation Period / A. Pstuszek // Future Human Image. – 2018. – Vol. 9. – P. 82–91. doi: 10.29202/fhi/9/8

Rudenko, S. Cosmology in the philosophical education of Ukraine: History and modern condition / S. Rudenko, Y. Sobolievskyi, V. Tytarenko // Philosophy and Cosmology. – 2018. – Vol. 20. – P. 128–138. doi: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/12

Шопенгауэр, А. Собрание сочинений : в 6 т. / А. Шопенгауэр ; пер. Ю. Айхенвальд. – Mосква : TEPPA – Книжный клуб ; Республика, 1999. – Том 1 : Мир как воля и представление. – 496 с.

Tsarenok, A. The Cosmological Potential of Byzantine Ascetic Aesthetics / A. Tsarenok // Future Human Image. – 2017. – Vol. 8. – P. 160–170.

Волынский, А. Л. Книга ликований: Азбука классического танца / А. Волынский. – Москва : Артист. Режиссер. Театр, 1992. – 299 с.





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.