DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.150217

COMMUNICATION LEVELS OF THE INDIVIDUAL

V. M. Rubskyi

Abstract


Purpose. The article deals with the problem of mutual perception of individuals, which implies the analysis of the anthropological prerequisites for the study of interpersonal communication. The work emphasizes the need to identify the gnoseological lacuna of the possibility and relevance of knowing someone else’s "I". As well as the need to point out implicit metaphysical attitudes, universal for many worldviews, which are implicitly included in the theory of personal communication. Theoretical basis. The author proceeds from the logical consequences of the evolutionary premise in anthropology. He compares the psychophysical goals of the interpersonal communication task with its ideological theory, monitors the impossibility of the realizing the communication level declared in the consciousness. As an opposite evolutionary premise, the author cites the postulates of the "philosophy of dialogue" by F. Rosenzweig, F. Ebner, M. Buber, and others. The correlation of these philosophical positions reveals the inconsistency of materialistic reduction in anthropology. Originality. The author identifies four levels of communication: background, obstacle, function and dialogue. He represents the rationale for the fact that the first three levels do not need the existence of an individual "I". The first three levels leave the existential "I" unnecessary and therefore unclaimed. The philosophy of dialogue with the Other raises an equally important question about the conditions for the possibility of a metaphysical continuum in ontology, and in turn, suggests the acceptance of a philosophical premise about God as the space of subjectivity in the "I-You" dialogue. Conclusions. Philosophical understanding of the communication of two existential "I" demanded in communication is possible only within the framework of religious discourse. The phenomenal consciousness can enter into communication with a specific other phenomenal consciousness only when there is a metaphysical space between them, allowing for the possibility of communication of such a level. The materialistic conditioning by the human evolutionary needs in all its conceivable forms produces a reduction of the communicative inquiry, which makes the mutual perception of the two "I" impossible. In this psychophysiological anthropological model, there is no space for the possibility of a dialogue of individuals.

Keywords


"I"; personality; communication; worldview; metaphysics; Other; evolutionism

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Carlsson, U. (2018). Tragedy and Resentment. Mind, 127(508), 1169-1191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx014 (in English)

Curren, R. (2019). Wisdom and the Origins of Moral Knowledge. In E. Grimi (Ed.), Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect (pp. 67-80). Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15860-6_6 (in English)

Frolova, M. I. (Ed.). (2018). Institut cheloveka: Ideya i realnost. Moscow: LENAND. (in Russian)

Grimi, E. (Ed.). (2019). Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15860-6 (in English)

Inyushina, I. A. (2017). The formation of culture of philosophical thinking: M. K. Mamardashvili’s ideas in the context of contemporary philosophical praxis. Philosophical Thought, 5, 62-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8728.2017.5.22913 (in Russian)

Koshelskaya, T. V., Muravyova, O. I., & Mareeva, L. V. (2018). Communication as a central phenomenon of contemporary anthropological concepts. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 67, 77-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/67/6 (in Russian)

Pinker, S. (2018). Chistyy list. Priroda cheloveka. Kto i pochemu otkazyvaetsya priznavat ee segodnya. Moscow: Alpina non-fikshn. (in Russian)

Ridley, M. (2016). Proiskhozhdenie altruizma i dobrodeteli. Moscow: Eksmo. (in Russian)

Rusakov, S. S. (2019). Conceptual-categorical apparatus in social philosophy of M. K. Mamardashvili. Philosophical Thought, 1, 44-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2019.1.27477 (in Russian)

Saenko, A. V. (2018). Specificity of the notions of the language of philosophy according to G. Deleuze, F. Guattari and M. K. Mamardashvili. Philosophical Thought, 9, 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.27237 (in Russian)

Slobodchikov, V. I., & Isayev, Y. I. (2000). Osnovy psikhologicheskoy antropologii. Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka. Razvitie subektivnoy realnosti v ontogeneze. Moscow: Shkolnaya Pressa. (in Russian)

Smirnov, I. I. (2018). Criticism of metaphysics and post-secular paradigm. Philosophy and Culture, 8, 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2018.8.27106 (in Russian)

Smirnov, S. A. (2017). Antropologiya i psikhologiya: Vzglyad na cheloveka. Vstrechnyy vyzov. Mir psikhologii, 4(92), 185-197. (in Russian)

Waal, F. B. M. d. (2018). Moral bez relihii. V poshukakh liudskoho u prymativ. Kharkiv: Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia. (in Ukrainian)


GOST Style Citations


Carlsson, U. Tragedy and Resentment / U. Carlsson // Mind. – 2018. – Vol. 127, Iss. 508. – P. 1169–1191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx014

Curren, R. Wisdom and the Origins of Moral Knowledge / R. Curren // Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect / ed. E. Grimi. – 2019. – P. 67–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15860-6_6

Институт человека: Идея и реальность / ред. М. И. Фролова. – Москва : ЛЕНАНД, 2018. – 348 с.

Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect / ed. E. Grimi. – Springer, 2019. – 207 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15860-6

Инюшина, И. А. Формирование культуры философского мышления: идеи М. К. Мамардашвили в контексте современного философского праксиса / И. А. Инюшина // Философская мысль. – 2017. – № 5. – С. 62–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8728.2017.5.22913

Кошельская, Т. В. Коммуникация как центральный феномен современных антропологических концепций / Т. В. Кошельская, О. И. Муравьева, Л. В. Мареева // Сибирский психологический журнал. – 2018. – № 67. – C. 77–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/67/6

Пинкер, С. Чистый лист. Природа человека. Кто и почему отказывается признавать её сегодня / С. Пинкер. – Москва : Альпина нон-фикшн, 2018. – 940 с.

Ридли, М. Происхождение альтруизма и добродетели / М. Ридли. – Москва : Эксмо, 2016. – 416 с.

Русаков, С. С. Понятийно–категориальный аппарат в социальной философии М. К. Мамардашвили / С. С. Русаков // Философская мысль. – 2019. – № 1. – С. 44–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2019.1.27477

Саенко, А. В. Специфика понятий языка философии по Ж. Делезу, Ф. Гваттари и М. К. Мамардашвили / А. В. Саенко // Философская мысль. – 2018. – № 9. – С. 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.27237

Слободчиков, В. И. Основы психологической антропологии. Психология развития человека. Развитие субъективной реальности в онтогенезе / В. И. Слободчиков, Е. И. Исаев. – Москва : Школьная Пресса, 2000. – 421 с.

Смирнов, И. И. Критика метафизики и постсекулярная парадигма / И. И. Смирнов // Философия и культура. – 2018. – № 8. – С. 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2018.8.27106

Смирнов, С. А. Антропология и психология: взгляд на человека. Встречный вызов / С. А. Смирнов // Мир психологии. – 2017. – № 4 (92). – С. 185–197.

де Вааль, Ф. Б. М. Мораль без релігії. В пошуках людського у приматів / Ф. Б. М. де Вааль. – Харків : Клуб Сімейного Дозвілля, 2018. – 272 с.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.