HUMAN INACTIVITY IN THE CONTEXT OF SUBJECT’S IDENTITY PROBLEM

Dmytro Yu. Snitko

doi:10.15802/ampr2013/14317

Authors

Dmytro Yu. Snitko Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2013/14317

Keywords:

subject, identity, activity, inactivity, self-alienation, existence, being-on-self

Abstract

The subject of article is analyze of essence postmodern understanding of human; finding relationship with personal identity and inactivity; accentuation on existential aspects of this relation; to investigate the alternatives to classical and pluralistic conceptions of subject’s identity. Scientific novelty of received results consists in a discovery of the relationship with human inactivity and personal identity. Results: the author has demonstrated that the conception of the subject and its identity in nowadays is very indeterminate. In particular, we can keep watching some contradiction between the interpretations of the subject as an amount of the identifications and statement as a basic ground of human his Self-being. In the context of this contradiction the author has demonstrate the relation with personal identity and human inactivity. Inactivity had understand how subject’s self-alienation and his self-identification with situational social roles and functions. This self-alienation leading to the perversion of true agency (doing), that must be direct on the own being. Grave cause of human inactivity is personal identity, that obstructing communicative, mental and practical agency. Therefore, how the alternative of classical and pluralistic conceptions of identity is the special form of identity, that ground on the subject’s Selfhood – being-in-world.

Author Biography

Dmytro Yu. Snitko, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

graduate student of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

References

Gabibova Z. Aktualnye voprosy ekzistentsii skvoz prizmu samoidentifikatsii individa. [Actual questions of existentia in the context of individual self-identification]. Ghileja: naukovyj visnyk [Ghileja: scientific bulletin], 2013, issue 68, pp. 346–348.

Gnatenko P. Identichnost: filosofskiy i psikhologicheskiy analiz / P. Gnatenko, V. Pavlenko [Identity: philosophical and psychological analyze]. Kiev, ART-PRESS Publ. 1999. 446 р.

Kozlovski P. Kultura postmoderna: Obshchestvenno-kulturnye posledstviya tekhnicheskogo razvitiya [Culture of postmodern: Social and cultural consequences of technical progress]. Moscow, Respublika Publ. 1997. 240 p.

Lakan J. «Ya» v teorii Freyda i v tekhnike psikhoanaliza (1954/55) [«Ego» in Freud’s theory and in psychoanalytic practice]. Moscow, Gnozis, Logos Publ. 1999. 520 p.

Palaguta V. І. Samoidentifikatsiya sotsialnogo subekta v diskursivnykh prostranstvakh. Monografiya [The selfidentification of social subject in discursive spaces. Monograph]. Dnipropetrovsk, Innovatsiya Publ. 2010. 440 p.

Svendsen L. Filosofiya mody [Philosophy of the fashion]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ. 2007. 256 p.

Turen A. Povernennja dijevcja [Return of the agent]. Kiev, Aljterpres Publ. 2003. 320 p.

Freyd Z. Vlecheniya i ikh sudba [The inclinations and its fate]. Moscow, EKSMO-PRESS Publ. 1999. 432 p.

Fuko M. Arkheologhija znannja [Archeology of the knowledge]. Kiev, Solomija Pavlychko’s Osnovy Publ. 2003. 326 p.

Khabermas Yu. Moralnoe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie [Moral conscience and communicative action]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ. 2001. 381 p.

Khaydegger M. Parmenid [Parmenides ]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal Publ. 2009. 384 p.

Khoruzhiy S. S. Praktiki sebya i dukhovnye praktiki: dve paradigmy neklassicheskoy antropologii / Fonar Diogena. Proekt sinergiynoy antropologii v sovremennom gumanitarnom kontekste [The practices of the self and spiritual practices: two paradigms of non-classical anthropology / The lantern of Diogenes. The project of synergetic anthropology in contemporary humanity context]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ. 2010. p. 74-239.

Giles J. The No-Self theory: Hume, Buddhism, and Personal identity. Philosophy East and West. Volume 43, Number 2. April 1993. P. 175-200. University of Hawaii Press Publ. Available at: http://ccbs.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-PHIL/james1.ht.

Guignon Charles B. Authenticity, moral values, and psychotherapy. The Cambridge companion to Heidegger. Edited by Charles B. Guignon. New York, Cambridge University Press Publ. 1993. р. 215–239.

СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ / СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗОВАННЫХ ИСТОЧНИКОВ
(ДСТУ ГОСТ 7.1:2006)

Габибова, З. Актуальные вопросы экзистенции сквозь призму самоидентификации индивида / З. Габибова // Гілея : науковий вісник. Вип. 68. – С. 346–348.

Гнатенко, П. Идентичность: философский и психологический анализ / П. Гнатенко, В. Павленко. – К. : АРТ-ПРЕСС, 1999. – 446 с.

Козловски, П. Культура постмодерна: Общественно-культурные последствия технического развития / Петер Козловски ; пер. с. нем. – М. : Республика, 1997. – 240 с.

Лакан, Ж. «Я» в теории Фрейда и в технике психоанализа (1954/55) / Жак Лакан; пер с фр. А. Черноглазова. – М. : Гнозис, Логос, 1999. – 520 с.

Палагута, В. І. Самоидентификация социального субъекта в дискурсивных пространствах. Монография. – Д. : Инновация, 2010. – 440 с.

Свендсен, Л. Философия моды / Ларс Свендсен; пер. с норв. А. Шипунова. – М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2007. – 256 с.

Турен, А. Повернення дієвця / А. Турен; пер. з фр. – К. : Альтерпрес, 2003. – 320 с.

Фрейд, З. Влечения и их судьба / Зигмунд Фрейд. – М. : ЭКСМО-ПРЕСС, 1999. – 432 с.

Фуко, М. Археологія знання / Мішель Фуко; пер. з фр. В. Шовкун. – К. : Вид-во Соломії Павличко Основи, 2003. – 326 с.

Хабермас, Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие / Юрген Хабермас; пер. с нем. под ред. Д. В. Скляднева. – СПб. : Наука, 2001. – 381 с.

Хайдеггер, М. Парменид / Мартин Хайдеггер; пер. с нем. А. П. Шурбелева. – СПб. : Владимир Даль, 2009. – 384 с.

Хоружий, С. С. Практики себя и духовные практики: две парадигмы неклассической антропологии / С. С. Хоружий / Фонарь Диогена. Проект синергийной антропологии в современном гуманитарном контексте; отв. ред. С. С. Хоружий. – М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2010. – С. 74–239.

Giles, J. The No-Self theory: Hume, Buddhism, and Personal identity / James Giles // Philosophy East and West / University of Hawaii Press. – V. 43, N. 2. – April 1993. – P. 175–200.– Режим доступу: http://ccbs.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JRPHIL/james1.ht.

Guignon, Charles B. Authenticity, moral values, and psychotherapy / The Cambridge companion to Heidegger / [Edited by Charles B. Guignon]. – New York : Cambridge University Press, 1993. – Р. 215–239.