Anatolii M. Malivskyi


The purpose of the article is to single out and comprehend the key points of Heidegger`s vision of the main ideas of Descartes` philosophy while searching «the other beginning» of philosophizing as anthropology. The implementation of the objective assumes the solution of the following tasks: justification of the Heidegger`s idea of the critical relation to the established stereotypes of technomorphism about the basic intention of Descartes` philosophy, the reconstruction of the context of Heidegger`s considering the understanding of the basic intention and main motives of Descartes` philosophizing, the authenticity analysis of the reception of Descartes` doctrine by Heidegger in modern literature. Methodology. The achievements of the anthropologically focused thought of the 20th century, namely existentialism, philosophical anthropology, personalism, communicative philosophy have the essential potential during the constructive judgment and theoretical reconstruction of anthropological intention of philosophizing. Heidegger's heritage takes on a special significance, especially his reflections about the ways of searching and finding a substantial alternative to the technicism in the form of «the other beginning» of philosophizing. Scientific novelty. The analysis of the scientific literature, devoted to the relationship of Heidegger – Descartes, testifies to the domination of the truncated understanding of Descartes`s philosophy deprived of an anthropological component, and, as a result, ignoration of the substantial succession of the Descartes` ideas by Heidegger. Considering Heidegger's corresponding texts devoted to the understanding of the deep transformations of the New time, we find out the anthropology as a cornerstone of science and technology. Understanding the basic part of anthropology in the culture of the New time makes Heidegger devote much attention to the destruction of the established ideas of self-sufficiency of science, technology, thinking and to the detection of those hidden ones from a superficial view of personal nature of philosophical knowledge. Conclusions. Heidegger reasonably decides to pay much attention to Descartes` heritage as one of the fundamental thinkers, whose works are especially important during the simultaneous understanding of both the sources of the European anthropology, and the formation of the bases of the technogenic civilization of the New time. Heidegger's heritage considerably contributes to more authentic interpretation of the basic intention and the main motives of Descartes` philosophy. His opening new prospects to a considerable degree is caused by his own anthropological orientation, critical attitude to the linear concept of the history of philosophy, the rejection of superficial teсhnomorphism interpretation of philosophy.


anthropology; teсhnomorphism; reductionism; rationalism; freedom; self-creation; ethics


Bofre H. Dialog s Khaydeggerom [Dialogue with Heidegger]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal Publ., 2009.


Dugin A. G. Martin Khaydegger i filosofiya drugogo Nachala [Martin Heidegger and the philosophy of the

other Beginnings]. Moscow, Academic Project Publ., 2010. 358 p.

Safranski R. Khaydegger: germanskiy master i ego vremya [Heidegger: German master and his time]. Moscow,

Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 2005. 613 p.

Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya [Being and Time]. Moscow, 1997. 452 p.

Khaydegger M. Yevropeyskiy nigilizm [European nihilism]. Saint Petersburg, Vladimir Dal Publ., 2007. 130 p.

Khaydegger M. Osnovnye ponyatiya metafiziki [Basic concepts of metaphysics]. Voprosy filosofii - Problems

of Philosophy, 1989, no. 9, pp. 116-122.

Martin Khaydegger. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? [What is called thinking?]. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego

Publ., 2006. 320 p.

Lammi Walter. Hans-Georg Gadamers Hans-Georg Gadamer's "Correction" of Heidegger Journal of the

History of Ideas Vol. 52, no. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1991), pp. 487-507.

Mansbach Heidegger's Critique of Cartesianism. Abraham Mansbach Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

Mulhall St. Heidegger and Being and Time. Second Edition. published 2005. ROUTLEDGE PHILOSOPHY


Wayne M. Martin. Descartes and the Phenomenological Tradition // A companion to Descartes / edited by Janet

Broughton and John Carriero. Blackwell Publishing. 2008. pр. 496-512.

(ДСТУ ГОСТ 7.1:2006)

Бофре, Ж. Диалог с Хайдеггером / Ж. Бофре. – Кн. 3. Приближение к Хайдеггеру. – СПб. : Владимир Даль, 2009. – 358 с.

Дугин, А. Г. Мартин Хайдеггер и философия другого Начала. – М. : Академический проект; Фонд «Мир», 2010. – 389 с. – (Философские технологии).

Сафрански, Р. Хайдеггер: германский мастер и его время / пер. с нем. Т. А. Баскаковой при участии В. А. Брун-Цехового. – М. : Молодая гвардия, 2005. – 614 с.

Хайдеггер, М. Бытие и время / пер. с нем. В. В. Бибихина. – М. : ad MArginem, 1997. – 452 с.

Хайдеггер, М. Европейский нигилизм // Хайдеггер М. Ницше, т. ІІ. – СПб. : Владимир Даль, 2007. – 130 с.

Хайдеггер, М. Основные понятия метафизики //

Вопросы философии. – 1989. – № 9. – С. 116–122.

Хайдеггер, М. Что зовется мышлением? / Пер. Э. Сагетдинова. – М. : Территория будущего, 2006. —320 с.

Lammi, W. Hans-Georg Gadamer's "Correction" of Heidegger // Journal of the History of Ideas. – Vol. 52. – No. 3 (Jul. – Sep., 1991). – Р. 487–507.

Mansbach, A. Heidegger's Critique of Cartesianism // 20 WCP: Heidegger’s Critique of Cartesianism Abraham Mansbach. – Режим доступу:

Mulhall St. Heidegger and Being and Time. – London; New-York : Routledge, 2005. –220 p.

Wayne, M. Martin. Descartes and the Phenomenological Tradition // A Сompanion to Descartes / edited by Janet Broughton and John Carriero. – Oxford : Blackwell Publishing, 2008. – Р. 496–512.

GOST Style Citations

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.